Yes, it IS really confusing when you try to make sense of all the false crap put out by the fossil fuel industry, I mean, it always contradicts the scientist who aren't being paid by big oil, how can that be? I guess we should all just relax and trust the oil producers, they are, after all, really rich, and rich…

Quoting an article in the National Review is not going to help your case..

There is an obvious answer that no one is addressing.

C'mon now. The NFL claimed he shouldn't have been flagged AND THEN WENT ON TO EXPLAIN THAT YOU CAN'T BE FLAGGED FOR A PRAYER. Do I really need to walk you step by step through how those two things are connected?

I know I'm fighting a losing battle here, but what is it with people who apparently don't know how to read and interpret commenting on this post?

Didn't Tebow routinely go down on his knee and pray after scoring a touchdown? I don't recall him ever getting penalized for that...

What's odd it that it's not like prostration is a foreign concept to Christians either. What exactly did the official(s) think he was doing?

"players are prohibited from engaging in any celebrations while on the ground." Isn't every celebration technically performed on the ground?

I'd be cool with an honest "Ah shit, we're a bunch of old out-of-touch Christians who just had no idea, we'll rescind the fine, apologize for the penalty, and make a small donation to whatever his charity is." Because I truly believe it was an honest (stupid) mistake. But since the NFL can never, ever, ever admit when…

sadly, it would be cheaper for them to replace their police-car fleet with MRAPs than buying new police cars.

"Littlejohn went on to say that the vehicle would be used by police officers for protection in the case of an active shooter, or if the school needs to rescue children from a fire, because no one in this situation has apparently ever heard of a fire department."

Water puts out fire, sure, but why use water when you can…

The problem isn't who comes first, it's execution and marketing.

Remind me: did Giz buy stolen photos of an iPhone, or an actual stolen iPhone?

Thanks. I'm wondering what Apple actually told Recode, since the quote from Apple says that they're "actively investigating these reports," which suggests that they heard there may have been a breach, as opposed to Apple knowing there was a breach, but the Recode article (particularly the first sentence) seems to…

I find it a little ironic that the same blog that got a ton of publicity off of a stolen pre-release iPhone 4 has the gall to look down their noses at those who leaked these photos.

The Deadspin article to which you link notes that this being iCloud only is very unlikely. In fact, any iCloud connection at all is speculation. Are you now saying it definitely was iCloud, for even one of the pictures? Any sources you have for this new information would be helpful.

If you read some of the other comments as well as the actual court proceedings, it seems the jury wasn't necessarily justifying the revenge homicide, but declaring that there wasn't any evidence that the father in question actually committed the crime. No GSR, no weapon, etc.

Credit cards are for suckers. If you play with snakes, you will be bitten.