SulaymanF
SulaymanF
SulaymanF

Where is she though? Under the bridge?

a 5-minutes-in-the-past time machine.

They probably DID. It’s a judgement call depending on the individual case. I’m not familiar with any study showing a problem with diclofenac in valvular disease, the concern is more for CAD patients and CKD patients.

Diclofenac’s warnings are not something new, it was taught to me in medical school about 6 years ago. It’s also to be avoided in people with kidney disease.

He’s completely ignoring the fact that Moore signed a publicity waiver before being interviewed, giving them the right to record and publish him.

He used to defend Woodward:

“You look at what he said about President Bush, what he said about President Obama, big scandalous things.”

If Trump was a Democrat, we would never hear the end of this story from Fox News. They would be looping her recordings non-stop and acting like this is Linda Tripp 2.0. O’Reilly would be demanding impeachment proceedings for gross malpractice and lack of security, and Hannity would talk nightly and daily about how

Jack, you did the Nazis and supremacists a favor, but they won’t see it that way. They still call you evil, liberal, anti-freedom regardless. You cannot placate these extremists, although you badly damaged your brand by trying. 

He also posted the guy’s cell number. 

That’s a default watchface. It will even speak the time in Mickey or Minnie’s voice.

Oh it’s more than “probably,” it’s a certainty. Go back and watch Fox News after Obama won. Twice. “People who don’t even know how to spell ‘vote’ decided the election!” “We’re a country of people who demand things.” “Stupid anti-American liberals voted him in!”

This is bad. Back when Trump was only a raving nut on twitter, he kept saying that America should block ALL trade and travel to the entire continent of Africa. Multiple Public Health experts and agencies patiently explained to the press that such an idea would actually worsen the problem rather than solve anything,

Why would the news honor her request to remain anonymous? 

The prisoner of war regime only applies to international armed conflicts (IACs)—those between two or more nations, situations of military occupation, and qualifying wars of national liberation. It does not apply in non-international armed conflicts (NIACs)—qualifying conflicts between a state and a non-state armed

I understood that reference

Why do you assume God can’t exist because these injustices happen? It’s simple; the teacher is silent during a test. Muslims at least believe God is giving respite to everyone including Satan, and when you die the punishment of evil people happens and victims are rewarded.

I’m sure YOU are an educated individual who knows humankind is awful everywhere, but a massive chunk of the public does not. Which is why every time there’s some Muslim criminal on the news the comments here and everywhere online in English forums swell up with “where are the Muslims against this?” but never bother to

Muslim women have been answering your question for decades. Generally speaking, they view it as both mustahab (something that pleases God but is not required, think of it like extra credit). Plenty of women wear it against the wishes of their family, so your assumption that it’s forced is silly, it’s like asking why