SulaymanF
SulaymanF
SulaymanF

Aren’t they obligated to disclose the flaw to Apple, as a matter of the administration’s cyber security policy?

Didn't he promise to support the winner in an earlier debate?

Polls show you aren’t alone. 80% of Democrat voters in the primaries have said they would be “satisfied” in having Hillary as their nominee, even if they voted for Sanders. She's just better than Trump and the other Republican candidates, despite her shortcomings.

Voters are closely divided. Both candidates agree on over 90% of the issues.

“Immune overload” is another BS theory that antivaxxers have. They think too many vaccines in one year can overload the immune system, even though every breath you take expose's you to tens of thousands as many antigens as all the vaccines combined. Sheesh.

They have a right to ask this, because Trump is the most extreme candidate we’ve seen in a generation. They’re not asking whether they should guarantee a democrat win, they’re saying how can we do something patriotic about someone who is clearly anti-American values? Trump’s policies are so extreme in bigotry that

You were correct up until you claimed the president wants to let terrorists in.

Notice how the FBI discovered nothing of value on the suspect’s phone, otherwise they’d be crowing about it and shoving it in Apple’s face in the press; “see? We arrested this man and had to wait weeks because you refused to help us. Think of all the attacks he could have carried out while we waited.”

Only if you limit the case to one specific phone, but as we all know, it wouldn't stop there.

And yet Republicans will probably deny this too, since it hurts their “no man-made earth changes” argument.

Hows he heck can someone be charged with resisting arrest when theres no arresting charge in the first place?

Interesting, do you have more info? My private university just throws people out if a professor doesn't like them.

This is kind of ridiculous to blame the team for supporting their friend before a trial. If he was convicted and they still supported him, that’s another story. If a friend of mine was accused of something I’d support him until he had his chance in court and I was told more about the details. Did they have video of

Sometimes lying is worse than the original accusation (that Uber is risky). Uber could have easily said “look, we do millions of rides per year, and even though we background check all our drivers some of them commit these acts without prior offenses. Yes, they happen in extremely rare cases and we’re still safer than

The US invaded and overthrew the Islamic Courts Union in 2006, which was popular and moderate. In the aftermath, the more radical al-Shabaab took over, and now they viewed the US as an enemy. ICU wasn’t great, but they were better than the mess we’re in now.

What a stupidly ignorant comment. The US repeatedly destabilizes their country and overthrows popular governments, and yet Somalis are blamed as the bad guys? Do you know anything about the history of US actions in their country and along their coastline?

...except when the Pentagon had bombed weddings and then insisted for days/weeks after that they hit a large training camp. Let’s not be so certain so quickly, shall we?

iCloud's breach was due to two factors, poor passwords for celebrities, and password resets allowing iCloud backups to be mirrored to a second phone.

Why should he consider the Chinese policy of encryption? Because it means his actions will create a precedent that will be used against American companies, American citizens in China, and dissidents who are working with CIA and state department. That's why.

The NSA has great capabilities, mainly exploiting flaws and holes, not as much brute force. Most people have awful password security, and NSA usually exploits that with dictionary attacks or searching a person’s documents folder.