No sympathy for such a scummy company. I hope they go under.

Again, you’re not listening to what I said and just repeating yourself. By what standard do you view an OS sufficiently modified to be a new OS? A new underlying codebase? OS X did that. Migration from one hardware architecture to another? OS X also did that. Thousands of new APIs? OS X did that.

That’s why these cars are over-engineered for redundancy. Planes do not crash because of one faulty sensor anymore, since they are now made to use several and use-cases where the data from multiple sources disagrees. If the radar stops working for example, the car will fail-safe, stopping the vehicle rather than…

Your idea has occurred to EVERYONE in the industry. Cars break down mechanically all the time, engineers take into account a software crash by having the car slow and stop.

People are thinking about this the wrong way. While some people want driving controls “just in case,” others are going to want the ability to override the system and speed.

Reminds me of a study where Americans were asked their opinion of Republican and Democrat policies, and the participants accused the researcher of lying because there’s no way Republicans could openly be advocating policies that bad for working-class Americans. They concluded the researcher must be lying or…

You are assuming that because Apple kept the version number low FOR MARKETING REASONS that there’s no major changes beneath. Every major architected piece of the OS has been replaced from it’s 2001 counterpart. Heck, the Finder was rewritten from scratch in Cocoa Objective-C several versions ago when back in 2001 it…

No, you can put it on a USB drive or install via target disk mode or use the built-in partition to reinstall the Mac OS.

Apple hasn’t released a new OS since 2001.

I agree. I saved everyone the time by writing it next to it. It was a complex migraine that affected her temporal lobe, where her speech center was, and acted like a temporary stroke for a few minutes. Fortunately it wasn’t permanent.

Do we still have any proof that Harper Lee WANTED these published? I’m not comfortable with her unauthorized manuscripts being published, especially when they supposedly ruin beloved characters. Does this lawyer even have proof that Harper Lee is okay with this?

Can someone explain the plot or do I have to go somewhere where I can watch YouTube?

Don’t all gloves resemble other gloves?

No, she had a complex migraine that gave her temporary aphasia. A severe enough migraine could give stroke-like symptoms for a few minutes.

It blows my mind how people don’t care about DUIs. Thousands die from this. It should be demonized like child molestation.

Pepper freak HAS to be a smoker. Those people don’t have any taste buds left.

But he was not arrested because he had a record, and it was irrelevant to the police’s actions. He was arrested and brought to jail over the LEGAL pocketknife, which is why the cops are facing “illegal arrest” charges.

His record was not the cause of arrest, thus it was irrelevant to this case.

The pocketknife was not illegal. That’s why the bad cops are on trial for “false arrest” on that basis.

All because a bad kid was doing bad things