I got worried for a sec, I thought this was about Uzumaki, which I’ve been patiently waiting years for.

N64 has always been hard to emulate. Nintendo used a unique CPU, GPU, and SPU for that console. Not to mention Nintendo did this on purpose to discourage lazy games by third party developers. Gamecube and Wii were easier to emulate.

Harrison Ford is 80 and he’s doing action scenes as Indiana Jones.

Whatever happened to citing sources? ChatGPT doesn’t do this and it’s wrong a lot. If you still want kids to write essays, force them to research and cite their sources.  

If that scene happened in a movie we’d get a whole EU backstory on that specific stormtrooper and how he modified his armor like Vader’s.

thomas germAIn

“The thing that makes a lightsaber feel powerful is that if it hits flesh, it’s going through”

The issue is complaining about JK Rowling does nothing. We all know already. People get tired of it. Buy Harry Potter stuff or don’t, people have made up their minds by now. If Kotaku staff doesn’t like her they shouldn’t talk about Harry Potter.

TLDR: “This game set 100 years before the events of Harry Potter isn’t progressive enough and that reminds me of JK Rowling who I hate.”

Tactics is easy to break though.  There’s a 1v1 fight where you just keep running away and gaining tons of EXP and now the whole game is broken.

I’m going to pretend you both meant VI but have to acknowledge a PS2 FF.

River Ward date raped me after I chose to drink lemonade on the water tower.  I don’t know what he put in my drink but I woke up with a hangover.

Putting any money towards Harry Potter either benefits her directly with royalties, or indirectly by keeping the brand alive, of which she will eventually benefit directly.

“If I buy a ticket to Universal Studios, I’m actually not putting money in Rowling’s pocket.”

Hopefully Universal adds a Perry Mason World to the new theme park they’re building.

Look, J.K. Rowling sucks, but going into every Harry Potter bubble and reminding people is trolling. Should we go to Universal Studios and tell the kids there that the creator of this world is a shitty person and they should stop having fun and leave immediately?

I think it’s unfair to look at someone helping people and get mad that they are also making a living on it. The anger is misplaced given the amount of ultra wealthy people that don’t help anyone, ever.

They are both horrible people that deserve each other.  Either way I won’t be watching any show they’re on.  

But will the CEO take “full responsibility”?  As long as you say that then everything you do is forgiven.

The top of a large company is where a bunch of friends/family get rich.  It doesn’t matter how well they do their job, or if they do it at all.  If there are problems, they will remove everyone else, and if the problems can’t be fixed, they will float away from the wreckage on their golden parachutes.