Very cool art!

I'm a movie fan. A cinemaphile some might say. It's my main hobby, it's how I digest probably 90% of my art. I read a lot of novels until I got too busy to fit them in, but I never read comics. I watch a few select TV shows (Game of Thrones, Penny Dreadful, Doctor Who) but I prefer movies by a large degree.

I have read numerous articles about modern women having to wear fake pubic hair because seeing labia is a big no-no with an R rating.

His theme was used in all three, which I think is the important part. Would love for Marvel to use that theme in their SM movies, it's super iconic.

I don't see why we need floating character faces on posters in general and never have. It's especially true when there's 20 characters in the movie though, that's for sure.

Of course. I'm not anti-science or anti-medicine at all. Just anti-cutting things off. ;)

Oh I didn't feel attacked, I think it's just an issue that's hard to talk about without sounding righteous. I just personally don't agree with chopping things off for passive health benefits. Especially things on the outside.

It is weird. Despite not being a great cartoon though that damn show aired constantly even in the 90's and early 2000's when I was watching a lot of TV at an impressionable age. I saw a ton of it and Aquaman was always the lamest in the lot. It became a cultural concept; "Aquaman is the lame one."

I would always err on the side of not cutting things off people, personally.

I feel like I was meant to feel those sensations, whether it means I don't last as long or not (and I last plenty long anyway). I definitely see it as mutilation, whatever the purpose. You don't cut things off people unless you have to.

He's been tainted by Super Friends and his lame costume for years. Hopefully the movie turns things around permanently in the public consciousness.

Yeah seriously.

I would guess he will just be a cameo in Civil War as one of the heroes Stark is tracking down or whatever. In fact the could do the origin in a weird cameo like that. For example have Stark's machines tracking him while he runs across rooftops in a proto-costume like Maguire's red and blue sweatpants and hood. That…

I think saying he never slept with Rose is your interpretation, not something they made clear. They leave it up to the viewer to decide in pretty much every case, and use euphemisms like "dancing" to imply sexuality without showing it, because it's a kids show and such. Not saying your interpretation is wrong, just…

Sure, but humans are obviously different. Rose was "mature" at 19 or however old she was, by human standards. I think as long as he isn't romancing children by their own species' standards it's probably fine, and normal for sci-fi.

Seriously, this reads like a random thread debate on Gallifrey Base, and that's kind of cool. Yet also oddly scary!

Similar species with compatible body parts, I don't see a problem with it. Star Trek did it ALL the time.

Depends on taste. She's way too skinny for me, but that seems to be the "in thing" lately. Either way I don't think it effects her playing the character.

Man, as a casual fan of the movies who never reads comics I have to tell you that "purple man" name has GOT to go.

Seriously, an evil lightsaber?