StevenAttewell
StevenAttewell
StevenAttewell

To be a massive pedant:

My first reaction is: about time.

‘sup.

Thanks for writing this, Oliver! This was a lovely rundown of the two series merits. It’s also important to emphasize that, even more than any value they have representationally, these are two of the funniest monthly comics ever published. Giant Days #50, which was all about cricket, has my vote for the single issue

I’m sad Giant Days ended, it had a great finale of course but I could have read the slice of life stuff about those characters like eternally.

That’s pretty much how I imagine it except for the Old Cap part. I’m pretty sure he comes back to prime timeline to say goodbye to his friends there. He doesn’t have to use the time machine platform to come back. There were decades for his reality Starks or/and Pyms to improve on Tony’s design of the time travel suit

He has it briefly when he catches the shield memorably

My first thought upon reading the headline was “King in Yellow on Broadway, great” and my second was “and I’m not not even surprised at this point.”

Marvel’s Avengers: Rise of Atlantis

Marvel’s The Avengers: Doom

The device Evans spent three years laboring to invent is a $400 WiFi-enabled tabletop machine that squeezes juice ... out of a bag of Juicero-brand juice. It squeezes bags of juice. It is a juice press that squeezes the juice ... out of bags of juice. Bags ... with built-in spouts ... that are filled with juice. Juice

In addition to being a perfect, visual summary of Snyder as a filmmaker, the GIF at the top of this post also depicts a scene from a much better movie in which Zod and Superman team up in the third act to defeat the real villain, Zack Snyder, who they realize has been the true threat to Earth all along.

Uh, there’s someone else you forgot to mention...

Ah Fate of Atlantis, the 4th Indy movie people actually wanted.

That’s incredible! It only took her a month to make that? That’s like ripping someone skull out and beating them to death with it. It doesn't seem physically possible!

"is it really that much of a stretch to say that a lot of our behavior is rooted in evolutionary adaptations?"

Yes. Absent identifying specific mechanisms, it is pretty shitty science to hinge human behaviour - which is a fuzzily defined collection of hugely varied and almost always non-uniform traits - on conjectures