Heh. I meant just “dude standing there in an idle pose” instead of a victory pose. But yeah, the stock t-pose would be hilarious too.
Heh. I meant just “dude standing there in an idle pose” instead of a victory pose. But yeah, the stock t-pose would be hilarious too.
So, being EA, they’ll just make it so he stands there with no victory animation at all?
So I guess you could say that the elusive targets......
So you mean Rugrats?
That’s predicated on the higher-ups giving a toss what the customer thought.
I dunno. Not allowing the blog to get something interesting because the blog has no readers because the blog doesn’t have anything interesting to share totally sounds like SQUARE ENIX to me.
Then you’d have like 20min of footage left....
I wouldn’t give them that much credit. My money is on “cheap cash in” with the backpedal of “oh! It’s an anthology now!” after backlash.
This reads like someone’s horrible gender-flipped fanfic retelling of the first movie. :(
Oh fuck. I just read it and now I’m depressed. Such potential, and this is what we’re going to get?
Is it me, or do Wanda’s legs look really messed up in that “zapping Vision” clip? I can’t tell how she’s positioned, but it looks like her legs are bending forwards instead of backwards. Ow.
What kind of witchcraft is this?
In the first 15 minutes, no less.
“The big question is, of course, whether the animated movie is going to be about the original Ghostbusters, much like the cartoon The Real Ghostbusters was meant to be. Or if it will be a whole new group of people.”
Sony’s having a sale on Assassin’s Creed titles on PSN, if anyone is interested:
Sony’s having a sale on Assassin’s Creed titles on PSN, if anyone is interested:
Picard lost like 4 hours of memories once because of this, too. He got infected by some energy from a nebula or some such, went back, beamed himself into the nebula as energy. They used the transporter to bring back Picard’s soul, sans all memories since his last transport out.
With how litigious Hollywood is, I’m sure it’ll still be legally safe parodies instead of actually Ray & Peter.
My money is that the villain is either Dan Akroyd or Bill Murray (or both) playing legally safe parodies of Ray Stanz & Peter Venkman.
Well, drug cartels also make billions selling drugs, that still doesn’t make it a good thing.
Wouldn’t the simple solution be that if you don’t like the rules Valve is implementing, then don’t use the service? I mean, it is their service to run as they see fit.