StarinaSeaofStars
StarinaSeaofStars
StarinaSeaofStars

Batman at the end of the day is a fictional character, he is not a flesh and blood real living being. He can do whatever the writers want him to. He is a ninja, who has mastered over 120 different martial arts, has unlimited resources, most likely superintelligence etc. He has no more excuse than Superman killing.

Self-defense legally, in most countries, is minimum required force used to subdue an aggressor. There are people in jail using more force than what was required in that context, everything from manslaughter to assault.

Legally self defense is minimum required force used to subdue an aggressor. No superpowered character can kill in self defense legally except against other Superpowered characters. IF you kill someone in self defense it is only legal if there was no other way out and your life was threatened (not verbaly but

You mean the thing I responded to in another comment how dumb people are constantly assuming that it means Superman flying away from Zod and hoping he follows as instead it being Superman forcing Zod away by any tactic or that I meant in that scene they completely failed making it so it was a forced choice, how

So you mean like BLM, woman shelters for abused victims, refugee camps, supporting doctors without borders, anti war protests and etc. Or perhaps the reason why we react to the act of superheroes killing because they are not in the real world and is in fact merely symbols and tools for telling thematic narratives and

It wasn’t that Superman didn’t have the motivation. It just clear the writers, director and producers never gave a shit about creativity and understanding the character.

Yes, the “he is Batman” is a correct and honest answer. He is a ninja with massive martial arts knowledge, superhuman intelligence, umlimited resources etc. If he kills he choose to do it. What if instead of killing the dude with the flamethrower, he instead took him out first by jumping that window, this was before

So superman killing Zod in my Scenario is temporary. Glad to know that Zod is not really dead in MoS neither than since it too was just a “temporary” measure.

It’s alright. I pretty much thought we had similar opinions about this just because I have read your other comments but still felt I wanted to comment to your comment. It was and continues to be a horrible portrayal of Superman. Right now to make me happy I am thinking about what they could do in a sequel to make it

Yeah first off the flying away part what I meant was when Superman was holding Zod in a neck hold why not fly away with him, instead of just killing him again he made a concious choice and the scene is set up to imply that if he did not kill Zod there Zod would’ve killed the family which I say is false sense he could

The economist said that apparently the movie needed to make at least over a billion to be profitable and anything under should be considered a failure. Do not know if that is accurate since I really can not care about the profits of the movie industry but I do know that the industry is much more complicated than

He stabs a guy in the throat that is not fucking indirect. There are many more scenes like it. I hate Burtons Batman actually, he never got Batman only the parts of the villains. The movie is good just not a good Batman movie.

See I agree with that he did not muder Zod but mostly likely in Smallville and Metropolis many people died because of him. But for me there was plenty of other ways to get out from killing in that horrible scene. He could have flown out, he could have thrown Zod through a wall, he could have taken his hand in front of

See i find that the best part, that as horrible as FRANK FUCKING MILLER as gotten and that is absolutly horrific and a scum as human being, he still is not as bad as Snyder with these characters.

But again these are Superheroes while in the real world, yes there must be a clear seperation between murder and acts of self defense. But that line is very blurry and there are many people in jail for overstepping what qualifies as self defense. There is a massive difference between Batman tackling Harvey Dent over a

yeah but in this DC universe what do you think will happen?

Really..... I mean fine if you like the movie and Snyder thats okay. But do not pretend that you are more objective or intelligent because you liked it. I hate Snyder and the movie and you know what I understand everything in it. That is why I hated it because I understood it. If you like it, fine. But stop the stupid

I agree on the hollowness of Watchmen. For me it and V for Vendetta was a scenario where I watched the movie first and thought they were both great. And then I read the comics and started realising that the movies just couldn’t compare. In both, but especially watchmen since it follows its source material more, they

“Watchmen is a frame-by-frame adaptation of the comic book, for all intents and purposes.”except without the intelligence, depth, subtlety and complexity of the comic.

But again hypothetically in a superhero storyline it would be easy to control US as well as having his corporate branches throw their influence around in many other nation, making sure the people sympathetic to him get in power positions and so on and so on. Like I said I really do not see the problem when there are