Since it is very apparent that you feel like insults are a way of making points. I have read it and played it. It is boring, dumb and gets nothing interesting and complex about any character.
Since it is very apparent that you feel like insults are a way of making points. I have read it and played it. It is boring, dumb and gets nothing interesting and complex about any character.
I can see how speeding the whole thing up makes it better.
You really did not get my point there did you. I accused you of thinking that.
I have seen the movie and it is awesome. The best thing is his connection to the Joker in it. I must get my thumbs out of my ass and read the comic
For me Injustice pisses on Superman and continues promoting interpretations of the character that is violent, xenophobic and authoritarian. It does nothing to explore the depth or complexities of the character for me. It also contains the implications that other characters are just superior to him. When they are all…
Do you mean that Batman has always been evil and we all just bought the propaganda figure for a fascist organization? Or the tired notions of Batman perfection?
But why are these only about Superman? Why not Wonder Woman? or Batman? TDKR the best protrayal of an insane Batman still makes it absolutely clear that Batman never gives in to his anger or pain.
Sorry about therapy man. Both lives equally fucked up.
Still for me I just do not see any interesting in this since his fall would be more interesting if for example he abandons humanity goes to the Fortress of Solitude or hell in to space and perhaps Darkseid invades or anti monitor comes or whatever else cosmic hellcreature that exists in DC and he just watches the…
But Batman does not kill the Joker at the end of Killing Joke. I know there is a common interpretation but since it is canon and Joker was alive afterwards he did not kill him and this implys the moral superiority of the billionaire with any gadget he wants with the working class guy that only tries to save people.
No, unless Joker was an uber competent billionaire who get every gadget he wants, Oh Wait so there is where he gets all the laughng gas from.
I do not know since I happen to believe in the interpretation that Lucifer was the good one rebelling against an evil determinist God.
But that is the problem how can you relate more to an evil dictator. Than a working class man with every single problem you have, but he can take on suit and help people make the world a better place. Superman is not a boy scout. He is just a man who wants to make the world a better place. I am massively flawed…
Who has not revisited MoS? When I first left theatre I did not hate it, I was confused (at the dumb choices, characters and plot) but than the more I thought about the movie I more I started to hate it. So I rewatched it a couple of times and I hate it even more since I had time to think about that movie.
I always felt that was an interesting question how does one make a film about the man who has massive power? that Boring.
Was there an evil expy of Superman or Wonder Woman or other DC characters? Than why is it okay to have one where Superman and some others are evil but the BatGod must be portrayed as a saintly figure.
Him killing your right about that but he has emotional maturity to be able to deal with it, if it were done well, with no way out and absolutly no other choice. The biggest problem with MoS is all the crap before he kills, because it is not the act of Superman who saves people but the act of a character that has no…
But the bad guys are most likely just poor people who have no other way out or protester against an imperialistic regime. So why are you trying to rationalise the crimes of a dictator? I am not as serious as my tone implies.
For me Injustice ruins a good character by not understanding that one is not humanising a character by making him a mass murderering psychopath, One is humanising him by showing his complexities, not made up flaws.
But again that is against the character of Superman since his entire point is that he has discipline using his powers only for the sake of others, not getting political power. I have already argue this in many answers to comments.