StarinaSeaofStars
StarinaSeaofStars
StarinaSeaofStars

Considering how I myself been attacked for merely not liking this movie (especially not liking MoS) I think it is hilarious how you think I attacked you by pointing out how a comment you made about how the fight came about organically was for me at least massively wrong it fails completely as a coherent story

Was it just me who found it massively pretentious? I mean with all the heavy handed symbolism, lack of complete depth or at least any coherent themes that does not border on a mental patient who thinks he is napoleon scribling with feces.

Really the movie dealt with fight organically. I mean at first there is the fanatically way Batman is stalking Superman than there is the useless confrontation Superman has with the idea of Batman, than None of it matters because Luthors insane bizarro world self blackmails Superman to fight Batman and the fight ends

The car chase, him saving Martha Kent (He stabs everyone who attacks him with a knife), the fact that Batmans introduction is a scene where we hear him torturing a guy close to death before branding him with a bat synbol. I mean I usually defend Batman that despite him being white male billionaire he still is a

I dislike Superman Returns and thinks it fails more than it hits but still that scene with him landing the plane is more awesome and gets the character better than any Snyder fight scene has.

I do not know but for me the last Avengers movie was meh

I read rarely superhero comics nowadays but I do feel as a fan one must recognize where the medium began and how much it owes to Superheroes (especially in america, because we foreigners grow up on a healthy dose of franco-belgian comics too :P)

First of all if you think people complain about Superman killing Zod and letting civilian as die is as simply as “he just shouldn’t do that” then you have not talked to intelligent people or has not listened. The problem with those parts of MoS is the fact that it is not built up properly and Bizarro (I refuse to call

Because Batman is not a fantasy (he is a billionaire who gets any woman he wants, any gadget he wants, he is always right, he has complete morality free narratives, he wins every fight etc.), I personally feel DC has more of a BatGOD thing then Superman. All good Superman stories have him be complex (in the real sense

It is funny how in your follow up comments you always seem to fall back on “it is just a comic book movei”. But as a huge comic book nerd I have to tell superhero comics are complex have rich and diverse philosophies and are meant to be reflected on, like all art it is something that gets better with reflection. Yes

yeah because comic books have never experimented with grey areas before..... Seriously if you hate comic books this much way are you even arguing about a movie based on them.

Do not remember exactly where Shuster and Siegel says difinitely Moses but know that it is exists. But why would two jews make a character that very obviously is based on the Moses story make a christ allegory, Messianic figures exists in many cultures and all over the world, Moses is a messianic figure. This is good

Actually both Shuster and Siegel has said that it was moses they were inspired by not Jesus in fact you could make the argument that by making Superman from a generic messianic figure(with focus from judaism) to a simple chris allegory is kinda anti semitic. Like fuck make him the the savor of everyone we have to

I feel like as a fan you can complain to hell and back beause it is obvious that they simply took the one comic book from the 80s that everyone outside comics is somewhat aware of (even though I personally has always felt TDKR is way overrated, there are many better Batman stories). But the worse thing is that the

I find it funny in the first point how you say that a research psychologist points out that everyone in AI believe it will happen sooner or later despite the fact that it brings on the question why many computer programmers, coginative scientists, neuroscientists and so forth have question their understanding of

First of all I have never said I am sorry i have to say what I have apologized for is if my writing seems aggressive or like it is trying to insult you because I feel both of those hamper a real conversation but since I am also a non native englishspeaker that means that i might write something in a wrong tone because

I am sorry because now I will sound insulting but How the fuck could you think I thought science meant static and unchanging when I critiqued “hard” SF for implying that that is what science mean. My entire point was how it is falsely implying it. Yes congratulation you have figured out science is open and forever

So Ursula K Le Guins science fiction does not takes science seriously or the works of any cyberpunk writer or any other science fiction writer that happens to write a work of science fiction that happens to either be wrong in his/her science or just wanting to write a science fiction book whether it is completely

I am sorry that I will probably be sounding agressive but I do not mean it.

The worst thing about this movie as well as suicide squad and anything else warner bros. have palnned for their DC film verse is that it all is just going to be mediocre and boring most likely, especially for fans of comics who knows the greatness that could be a film about these characters and that is sad I mean it