Srynerson
Srynerson
Srynerson

Its a state rep seat that has been unopposed for the last two elections. Its a safe dem seat, so nobody bothers to oppose and nutjobs step into the vacuum for some reason.

According to your link, the Democratic incumbent won in 2012 with 56% of the vote. He ran unopposed in 2014 and 2016 which seems to indicate that it is a safe blue district.

I imagine there’d be some manufacturing costs to consider when making many various boob types. But still, I say it’s worth it.

Corporal (Corporal!!!) Cruachan IV of course has a Twitter feed, partially written from his point of view, and there goes my afternoon.

This little guy is a bit of a legend as well (how much do I love the Welsh for having a Royal Goat that supports LBGT week? A hell of a lot).

Maybe ball pits are cleaner when they are aimed at adults, but since working at a science museum that had a ball pit full of red and white balls (to represent blood cells) that had to be disinfected each day, I don't go near ball pits. 

look if bachelorette parties all have dick cakes, i dont know why the fact that i had a boob pit at my bachelor party makes me a douche.

I spent a lot of time working in the ad industry, so I have a fairly high tolerance for bullshit, but “part speakeasy, part speak out” managed to elicit both eye-rolling and nausea. Goddamn copywriters.

I agree that a lot of this pink feminism marketing stuff is hollow bs, done mainly to get women to buy crap. However, all this hating on things simply because they are pink or feminine-looking looks an awful lot like internalized misogyny.

the switch to comic sans really sells the second one.

If you’re gonna make it look hand painted and weathered WHY COMIC SANS???

part speakeasy, part speak out...”

Maybe if women stopped buying shit that’s pink and marketed specifically to us, it would no longer exist?

Actually, let’s remember some comments when Republican Congressman were shot at a baseball game

Many commenters around here had no problem saying Scalise getting shot was just Karma. And they’ll fail to see the irony when they agree with HamNo here. 

no no, the “climate of hate” argument only goes one way silly.

If you have a contract, you have a different relationship with your employer, even in an at will state. If you have a contract that says you can’t be fired unless you do “x” then if they fire you, the state may not have a problem with them, but a judge will if you sue them for breach of contract.

That’s interesting, but what has this to do with the article about accusing people of serious misconduct while remaining completely anonymous with zero evidence to back up said claims? This boils down to “trust us, we, the anonymous internet strangers who can’t be held accountable have carefully researched all those

Dude was clearly damaged by those stories, and he’s got a right to have it proven out whether that damage was justified by the truth or not.

Well, legally, this is the correct decision.