Srynerson
Srynerson
Srynerson

She was robbed and assaulted in a hotel in a foreign country, not her home.

Why would you sully the good name of the KFC Double Down by associating it, no matter how tangentially, with Donald Trump? Have you no decency, sir?

Death is a real impediment in that regard.

I’m glad this is being done, but at the same time I’m 99% certain that Trump would have the whole thing bulldozed within 24 hours of being sworn into office and not give a $h!t about the public reaction.

Any job that people aren’t willing to pay such a wage for? (P.S. The term “living wage” is meaningless when used in isolation, since the wage it takes to maintain a given lifestyle in Manhattan is rather different than what it would take to maintain the same lifestyle in, say, Fort Scott, Kansas.) 

Starred for the Nermal reference.

Is that a Slitheen disguised as Rose there?

It’s “vile” to think that there’s a possibility the robbery was part of an insurance scam?

I was going to say, “O RLY?” But then I double checked and found that William Rufus DeVane King was Franklin Pierce’s vice president, not James Buchanan’s, so you would probably be correct that it would be the first time a president and vice president in the same administration have had sex with each other.

Serious question: When did non-consensual public hair touching become a thing? Because I can’t recall hearing about incidents of it until maybe five to seven years ago and I’m definitely sure that I never heard about it when I was a kid in the ‘70s and ‘80s.

You have a thing for drunken felons?

I’m pretty sure BB&B coupons are addressed to not just the named individual on them but also “or Current Resident” or something like that, so there’s no problem.

Thanks to Homicide: Life on the Street, I understood that reference.

a bullshit diktat that lines up perfectly with faux-amateurism ideals the NCAA’s clutched onto for the past 30 years

Uh, that tweet doesn’t show up on Trump’s Twitter page....

Claiming that the kid shot at them takes it to another level. That’s not a disputed “furtive movement,” that’s something that can be objectively verified in multiple ways (e.g., gunpowder residue on the shooter’s hand(s); testing of the gun; ballistics work on the bullet if they can find it; etc.). It would be an ex

Is that being smug or reasonable? If the kid fired the gun, there should be gunpowder residue on his hand(s), which is difficult to fake when the alleged shooter is still alive.

From the post: “Both are young black Democratic lawyers . . . .” (Emphasis added.)