Can’t tell if you mean the films or asking if I’m Gay.

True, the number of wheels you car powers is irrelevant when you lose traction, but it is relevant when starting from a complete stop, and could help with traction when maneuvering, assuming the driver knows how to handle their car in the snow.

This is generally the accepted “best drivetrain/tire combo” for winter driving:

I often wonder, do people like you ever read back what you wrote and realize how mind-numbingly stupid it is?

Counterpoint:

Schiller sounds like a wonderful man, but the city could be held liable if 15 homeless people burned to death because they overlooked safety regulations.

Can I ask a question?

Never in a million years would I have guessed it could be close to a 1:6 ratio. Even here in the mid-sized entry-level luxury sedan capital of the world, I’ve seen like 2 Alfas.

I’m mostly shocked at the BIG GUBMINT OVERREACH.

You’re right that ordinances and codes are there for a reason, and that homeless people camping out in some random guy’s basement is not a great situation. That said, I think that if the only takeaway you have here is “a very sound and reasonable proceeding by the city,” you might be missing the broader point. The…

“They could get trapped without proper fire exits and perish in the flames! It’s about safety!”

Mr. Schiller’s house does not comply with codes and regulations that guard against potential dangers such as carbon monoxide poisoning, inadequate light and ventilation, and insufficient exits in the event of a fire.

Remember folks.

You think homeless people care about housing regulations when they are freezing on sidewalks? I’d say you’re getting worked up about the wrong thing here, buddy.

If he wanted to kill black people, why didn’t he just become a cop?

It’s not our government’s policy.

And if you leave a month before the first date to a nation that grants you a one year visa upon entry?

This being really hot take notwithstanding, since we don’t allow people under 18 to vote because they’re idiots, can we also not allow people over the age of 65 (70?) to make regressive decisions that have impacts that are felt longer than their expected lifespan?

Because the country that you are visiting wants to be sure that you will be able to leave by the time you have to leave. They don’t want you “stuck” there because your passport is expired.

Yes. It seems like the rule should be, “If you mess up your ballot, it won’t count.” Not, “If you mess up your ballot, we’ll try to figure out what you meant and hope our unconscious biases don’t influence our interpretations.”