Here’s a good example of conservatives thinking their case is different:

The same goes for “who pays for insurance/damage in an autonomous collision?”

That’s why we should use tax dollars to build a wall instead. A wall would have kept all that water in the Gulf, where God intended it to be.

Ah, well now I don’t feel so foolish.

Ah, my bad... I read that incorrectly.

Technically, but I don’t think Finn Jones did himself any favors by signing on for Iron Fist.

Four years of PAID leave.

Trucks have given up usefulness for style for decades now. The people have voted with empty beds.

I would say the Elio is more dangerous than a motorcycle, due to limited power and much decreased maneuverability. A motorcycle can use agileness and speed to escape dangerous situations the Elio cannot.

Not sure why he expects Mitsubishi to cover anything in this situation. It’s way out of warranty. I would have told him to pound sand.

If you’re going to change cars every 4 months, why bother getting so picky?

Honestly, who hasn’t let their python out for a bit of fresh air on a long drive?

I expect a really anti-climatic ending. Like after 15 seconds, a power cord or hydraulic line gets snipped and it’s over.

So, to refute my statement that cars can be too small, and that making them larger can lead to efficiency gains, you cited the XL1, which is larger and is more efficient than the Elio?

Are you saying that compact cars are the same shape aerodynamically as the Elio? That would be incorrect.

They’ll never get near 84 mpg with this car. The first cars to hit that consistently will be much large than this car is. Small little dinky cars like this with smaller, dinkier motors, will never achieve anywhere near this mileage

You talk about killing one baby, and suddenly you’re King Herod. I want my country back!

I’m pointing out that most of you know jack shit about the tech or policy required - much less the costs involved.

The more moving parts a system has the more prone to failure it is.