What about all right? Or rocket ship? Or cold turkey? Or brain surgeon? Or lake effect? Or word processor? Or light box? Or turn in? Or let up? Or put down? Or take out?

If you can make a subcompact with 125 hp and sell it for $15k, it should be child’s play to get that same car with 250 hp for $17k. Add some slightly better brakes and suspension and call it $20k.

Balsa wood has great a strength to weight ratio, but it would be a bad choice for house construction (or even aircraft beyond hobby level toys). Hydrogen is the same.

It really boggles my mind that you think a car swerving out of a lane (and towards the supposed object of fear!) is a remotely expected outcome when being passed. The legality is fucking irrelevant to this situation. There’s no excuse for the car to react like that. He got charged with aggravated assault awfully fast,…

1. There was no wasp. The driver swerved directly at the bike because the bike was passing. From the original post:

The driver swerving and hitting the bike was the direct result of the bike passing. It’s not right, it’s just what happened. If he hadn’t passed illegally there would be no story here.

Reading comprehension is a rare skill these days, sadly.

He’s not saying the biker deserved it, he’s saying that had the biker NOT broken any laws he wouldn’t have been hit.

Let do this: next time you run a red light, or go 10 over the limit the nearest driver can smash into your door going full speed?

You don’t destroy 99% perfectly good cars because of environmental reasons. That’s hypocritical.

Until someone realizes that they can hold an entire city/country hostage by hacking into the non-existant AI security though the cars own wireless network.

Heh, wait until the cars recognize each other and then just aim for people.

“our crash logs show that vehicle control was returned to the human operator 0.74 seconds prior to impact, therefore our AI is not responsible for any events occuring after control was relinquished as clearly stated and agreed upon in our non-optional 768 page AI-control EULA”

Yes. In fact I think they also should have options for yellow,orange, red, pink, and purple. All in the obnoxiously loud color spectrum. There are enough monochrome cars already.

The inability to read is a requirement to take up firearms in the name of the second amendment. I mean, it’s really tough to finish reading an ENTIRE sentence and understand ALL 27 or so words.

They need to save on oil use so they can crack it for the hydrogen...

Honestly, if people were serious about the environment, you could easily get 100 MPG or more out of an ICE car. The problem is that it would more closely resemble a dildo-on-wheels than a traditional car.