Well, not quite the first black man to portray The Doctor, but I know what you meant.

That’s just your opinion , and the ratings actually went up once the Doctor became a woman. Everybody didn't automatically hate it just because you did.

The Darkhold corrupts everyone who reads it. Even Life Model Decoys. 

It is said by many actors that drama is easy and comedy is hard.

Why?

Shut up, idiot.

Is it because she was a witch and not a sorcerer?

Not all puns are inherently awful. That’s actually a clever pun in my book. But the pun is already in Goldin’s listing.

Wasn’t Betsy Braddock Captain Britain at some point, or am I just making that up in my head.

Counterpoint, this movie was wild and fun because Sam brought Evil Dead energy to what could have been a more generic slog.

Which, hey, they can’t all be tribute laps. For me the important takeaways were:
* Hayley Atwell and Lashana Lynch looked great
* Anson Mount actually got paid enough to get in the Black Bolt kit
* 818-Reed Richards was as fittingly dumb as we know 616-Reed can be. Just tell Wanda how to defuse your big gun, why don’t…

You must have missed the final scene of the movie where he actually grew the eye just before the credits rolled. Also the third act where his multiverse self had a third eye from using the Darkhold.

Here’s my annoyance with the Earth 616 thing. That is the number that Mysterio gave the MCU Earth in Far From Home, but we later learn that Mysterio is a fraud, and that his whole “multidimensional warrior” schtick is a lie that his creative team dreamt up.

I think the answer here has to be that the movie and comic multiverses are totally separate. Not even on a “one level higher” context, but literally no ability to overlap. And within the comics, there is a universe that creatively aligns with the MCU; same characters, look, stories, etc. But comic and movie…

Who would pay that much for something that’s only as powerful as a couple of gold plated gamecubes taped together?

How on earth did you make it through this entire article without making an awful pun about “using the Royal Wii”?

I’m shocked an amoral weapons manufacturer takes extreme positions in an attempt to over correct his mistakes and insecurities.

It’s not the media’s job to decide that official information released by a studio is a spoiler or not.

...and entirely on-brand for Tony Stark.

I think io9 is following the policy of “if it’s been revealed in an official trailer from Marvel, it isn’t spoilers.” Whether that’s the correct policy, given how spoilery some trailers can be these days, is a separate question.