Like Sunhawk said, the cars they destroy are either tube frame replicas and/or made from junkyard bodies and frames most would never even consider repairing. The guy who makes them is a friend of Jay Leno, too.

And now we wait a few years for GM to release the one that has the LT7 (no, not the Olds diesel V6, you know what I'm talking about). A 427 in any car is a damn good car. I'd forgive it for not having a handbrake even!

That car's looks have really grown on me over the years. Initially I thought it was hideous, now I think it looks alright.

Ah yes, the Carlton. Amazing car, but somehow it fails to appeal to me. I suppose the anonymous styling is part of it, but at the same time the sleeper aspect should make it more appealing.

Will there be an AWD Mazdaspeed version?

Not enough mentions of that mustache.

My thoughts exactly.

No, not at all, just not "smoking" hot.

"Fiberglass rear end"

I was talking about the kit, see the other guy who asked.

Something like this, I realized the Pontiac doesn't have connected taillights.

Thanks for understanding my thesis.

I've heard a race-prepped version of that engine.

I don't, but people give them too much flak.

I'm not seeing the "smoking hot" part, Patrick.

For the kit, of course

I actually like the '74-'77 Camaro, partly because of Transformers (not because I particularly liked the movie, but because Beater Bumblebee looked really cool) and partly because those massive front and rear bumpers make the car look like it means business (in a Death Race kind of way). The taillights are pure 70s to…

The only thing I like about early second generation Camaros is the rear. Has anyone ever built a '69 with a '70 rear? That would be awesome.

Seeing this I realized that the C7 taillights aren't all that bad, what truly bothers me is the the fact that they didn't separate the exhaust pipes into two pairs.

Nope, you're not alone. There are some older Ferraris I desire, but the newer ones don't rock my boat at all.