Rather than write a column about how we should give our piece of shit female athletes a pass like some male athletes have gotten, wouldn’t it be better to write a column about how we should stop excusing shitty anti-social behavior because someone is good with a ball? You know, as opposed to this piece trying to paint…

You don’t seem to understand where the artists are coming from and I find this whole article to be in incredibly poor taste, especially the bratty insults directed at someone who simply told you “no.”

So many things I want to say...

-I love how it’s wrong for him to not do what you told him to do.
-I love how you got the tattoo elsewhere, the same day, and you still needed to write this takedown piece.
-I love how people told you many tattoo artists don’t do necks and you still fumed.
-I love this (fragment of a)…

Female artist here. Don’t tattoo faces, necks, hands or genitals as standard. My choice. If anyone wants to bitch they can go elsewhere because guess what, artists are not machines and are allowed to have some agency over who and what they tattoo. Just as I don’t need to tattoo a swastika and white power slogans on…

Yeah, as a heavily tattooed woman I agree. I’ve had most artists make recommendations about placement and style to me. In fact, I’ve had sort of the anti-Dan experience (with a guy who also refuses to do hand and neck tattoos on people who aren’t already covered in tats, btw—it’s seriously a common policy) where my…

White girl outrage is always petty. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I love that you have this inside knowledge. Please tell us more about how she lied. I can't wait to hear about how you are a detective working the case, or that you can morph into flies and hang out on walls to get your scoops. Seriously, really looking forward to your "facts."

Nah, you can have immense respect for the work defense lawyers do and understand why zealous defense is crucial to the functioning of our legal system and still scoff at hack lawyers pushing out slut-shaming press releases for public relations purposes.

To the extent that this is correcting patently false statements (e.g. the defendant forced his way into the victim's apartment), the defense attorney is completely justified. The slut shaming (talking about evidence clearly inadmissible under any shield law), however, is repugnant.

OK. I've been following this discussion and I really need to say something. I know someone like this woman. I know someone who would probably do the same thing. There are people who are being crushed by the system...and then there are people who feel entitled to certain things, and will do just about anything to get…

It's not bizarre at all, and it has nothing to do with people not reading your posts—it's how Jezebel always reacts to posts like yours, whether they're trying to excuse rapists, domestic abusers, child abusers, or anyone else.

Yes, me and every single other person who has read it. Funny that.

LMAO coming from a person doing mental backflips to excuse rape that's rich. Honey, you wouldn't know about what wanting to make the world a better place is if it bit you on the face.

Cause you can't answer the question and defend your point without looking like an even bigger idiot.

Um, yeah, you are. Because as someone else just pointed out, you are inventing facts - that she "snapped" (despite her crime having taken place over a long period of time, not instantly), that she was "driven to this extreme" because she couldn't afford home care (a defense she never raised, and she apparently had a…

"Let's hope you and I and others are never in a position where we are so desperate to see our loved ones taken care of in the best way possible that we simply snap and fall into an abyss in which we cannot find a way out."

Well to be fair, it is a valid question.