Ok... and?

So what's worse for you ladies?

If she had said 'no' or 'stop' at any point during the encounter, you would be right.

LOL, you're a nut.

Oh, I know there are examples of it out there.

"There's so many forms of human capital, and they're not all looks...I get so tired of having to cry out 'misogyny,' but that's what's going on in this situation."

I think the problem with those is that people (men and women) do find the male characters at least likeable and affable.

I would eat that too.

I am a 20-something, and friends with a lot of 20 somethings, and while we do lack a degree of self-awareness when it comes to certain issues, interactions, behaviors, it is not evident in every single thing we say and do.

Fair enough. I still think it's sketchy as hell, personally, especially if it wasn't clearly laid out in the craigslist ad that the fee was for her time, and that sexual activities would be extra on top of that.

Meh, I disagree. I think they're exactly the same thing, one just happens to come with a cover-story that makes the nature of the transaction murky enough to make prosecution a little more difficult.

Ok.

I'm debating the definition of theft with him, sure. Why?

Oh, I agree you shouldn't be able to kill somebody for stealing from you.

LOL, well the transactional nature of using an escort is a little more cut-and-dry than the transactional nature of dating.

Off topic, but I'm curious.

True, but if the sandwich place takes your money and doesn't give you a sandwich at all, would you call that theft?

Clearly she's not having a hard enough time.

INcredibly beautiful, rich women aren't allowed to have problems too?

Thank god for the hair removal industry.