Socratic82
Socraticsilence
Socratic82

I mean, it’s not great that Labour is currently controlled by a cultish faction more concerned with purging the remnants party’s last electorally successful regime than it is in stopping Brexit. 

Sure would be helpful for the UK (and the world) if Labour wasn’t also headed by a Brexit supporting hack who (like Johnson) seems to have developed a skill set and persona better suited for a minority back bencher than a potential PM.

Seriously?

Way, way less when you add in fuel (not even counting all the other costs). 

This. If for “didn’t do anything to discourage” you mean "based business model on encouraging". 

Hahahaha, Gabbard will be hard pressed t9 retain her House seat and Williamson couldn’t even get the Democratic nomination for a House a seat from an extremely blue district when she ran a few years back.

She was a conservative Dem because she represented a conservative district in the House, she’s been relatively liberal since moving up to the Senate.

Okay, I keep hearing this but how is it actually? 

I mean, especially for an incumbent, the bigger thig is regardless of opponent Trump seems stuck at roughly 40 percent which is devastating. 

Assuming she’ll retire then...just saying I mean she could have retired in 2013 or so.

I mean the AFL-CIOs experience last cycle where they waited until the Primaries were over to endorse then got flack from both Sanders folks (for not waiting until the convention even though the race was decided) and Hillary folks (for moving so late) would seem to suggest that no union should endorse until the Fall

So Warren has a detailed fully fleshed out plan to abolish the Death Penalty on a state by state and federal basis while Sanders has ineffectually said the Death Penalty is bad for 30 years? 

Eh... Sanders has remained relatively static, while Biden has fallen and Warren has risen. 

Eh....it would seem kind of redundant (and also take 2 Dem Senators out in states with Republican governors). 

How are closed primaries unfair?

Honestly, we needed a strong challenger in the 2016 Primary, effectively locking in the support of of all but relatively marginal contenders in the run up to 2016 was perhaps Hillary’s most impressive electoral feat— there was a definite appetite for an alternative to Hillary- to the extent that a candidate with deep

She has been in obscurity, this vertical is just obsessed with the 2016 primary

This. Also for Wisconsin I’d point out that while the Clinton campaign cluld have done more, the Badger state was a major focus for a number of left-leaning groups both moderste and progressive due to the Feingold race 

And Bernie lost to her!!!

So.... They aren’t doing anything like the Marvel Netflix shows then huh?