Socratic82
Socraticsilence
Socratic82

Nah- the New York Magazine analysis is right - - this, the flyovers, appearing with the heads of the various branches- it’s all boo shields attempting to conflate himself with others so that he isn’t jeered publicly- there’s a reason he’s the only President in living memory not to toss out a first pitch— he can’t

Yes the tragedy of having the last two Democratic Presidents who collectively presided over the two laongest periods of economic expansion in our nation’s history, initiated the single largest expansion of thebsocial safety net since the great society, helped pull the country out kf recessions they each inherited,

Yeah Piers is special, a goal celebration is a declaration of war (not saying they can’t be brutal but excepting the deserved Croatian celebration vs. Russia in Russia I can’t think of anything) after spending the last 30 months gargling the balls of a waddling diplomatic nightmare is more than a bit much

Holy fuck. I honestly thought that was typical kinja sarcasm but no- Neville Neville- a cricketer, damn you don't get much more foppishly British than that. 

VAR again

So wait....he’s basically saying he caused the homelessness problem in major cities? Because I can name something else that began just over 2 years ago. 

“Mike, I read the accompanying books and they insist the female orgasm isn’t a myth.”

Oh no, did Donnie wander off without his minders? The heat index is 90+in the DMV someone call in a Grey Alert.

Damn...Kilmeade is still Kilmeading and now this douche is acting out so he’s not the dumbest man in public life with the surname Doocy or Ducey. It’s all coming up Steve. 

I have to say, it’s kind of amazing how Kilmeade and interchangable Fembot consistently make Steve Doocy— a man who the “More Fox & Friends” list helpfully reminds us tried to roast a marshmallow with his bare fucking hand look like the sane voice of reason. That’s just amazing casting- the man who would otherwise

Brian Kilmeade exists to make Steve Doocy feel smart and erudite. 

This. It seems like a damned if you do, damned if you don’t paradox. 

I mean....white millennials are kind of damned if we do, damned if we don’t on this issue aren’t we? (To be clear I mean just on this issue, obviously on the whole if not individually we benefit from privilege) If we move into/stay in the cities we’re gentrifying and if we move out/stay in the suburbs we’re selling

Trump wants to put Vanks on the ticket and his mental decline has reached such a point that his advisors can’t stop him?

I mean--- I’m all but certain the person quoted meant it in a negative way.

Letting other citizens vote isn’t disenfranchising yourself. 

Not to mention that nationalization of industry by the executive was ruled unconstitutional —in war time, for a defense critical industry (Steel) in Youngstown v Sawyer.

You’re talking to people who think that AOC represents the base of the party instead of the far left wing of it. 

In what way does Harris not fit on the left side of the spectrum in the context of American politics- in the US context Biden is center-left (say 60 to 65 on a 100 point scale); Obama way left (say 75-80) and Harris is slightly to the left of Obama on most but not all issues. 

At the very least her approach to acheiving progressive ends is substantially more fleshed out and realistic than Bernie’s-- I get why he opposes repealing the filibuster but he has to realize that without doing so it’s all but impossible to achieve any of his legislative proposals (or perhaps he doesn’t, there might