Is it that Hawk only does road games, or that Benetti only does home games? I figured if Benetti doesn’t travel they need to get someone else, I didn’t know Hawk was the deciding factor.

It’s like if House of Cards was starring Forrest Gump.

I do, that was before some right wing prick funded a gaggle of lawyers to punish gizmodo’s parent company, forcing them to meld their surviving blogs together or risk losing readers.

That’s exactly what got me thinking; shoes, food, clothes, people get help with that, obviously.

Thanks, and thanks.

I didn’t watch the show, I just watched the skit up here.

I just watched “Doomed” about the never meant to be seen original Fantastic 4, Constantin Film comes out looking realllllll bad, and now I’m mad at them, so: fuck them and their reboot.

Yeah, someone said that already. Thanks.

Yes. Someone answered earlier about a crowdfunding effort. That’s awesome.

So you get to decide what sex you call people regardless of their genitalia?

And that’s the answer to my question.

It’s nothing to me; I wasn’t complaining. I was asking, like other “ex cons” is she crashing with people and getting set up?

The place she’s in, video game system, new shoes. On another “ex con” I’d figure it belonged to someone else... but I got to thinking, has someone given her money for her story or anything like that? Or is she getting help like other people do their first week out of prison?

Does she have money? Did people pay her? Or is all of that on someone else’s dime so far?

Yeah, that’s the same thing.

Do you have two car keys? To the same car?

I think choosing a “unique” name based on a movie character is stupid. This is mostly because of a woman at my first job that I hated had named her daughter Trinity because of The Matrix.

I loved both, but with Hardhome I felt hopeless, “holy shit, you can’t win.” So when it was done I was saddened for the loss of life and relieved for Jon.

Because kids don’t want to watch obscure things.

I can’t believe reality tv works that well, like, it’s worth the viewers it gets. The people that will watch a fourth broadcast of some tattoo artist competition, or make up specialist, or obese little people that eat chalk, are worth alienating the people that want quality programming?