Shuke
Shuke
Shuke

I think she's flirting pretty hard with the Vicky Mendoza Diagonal, though.

1st Gear: 10-15% Of Future XTS Sales Should Be Vsport

"I still want to be able to enjoy my youth."

I want to stick my babies in this.

It's north of NYC...therefore, it IS upstate. End of discussion.

Ditto shuke. I did the same experience at. Monticello (prolly saw you there) and it was awsome.

What about KITT? Even google cars are still far from it.

Does it count if it's a real car, but has scince fiction type gadgets on the inside?

This "spoiler in the headline" thing on Jalopnik seems to have started with you, Travis. And from the get go people have commented on it only to have you get all 8th grader snippy. What you have accomplished is to keep readers like me away from Jalopnik after races, sometimes for days, as I find the time to catch up

I'd be fine if you'd stop using the winner in the damn title. Ruined last week's race for me, and you've done it in the past. I can avoid an article with an F1 picture or title, I can't ignore the title itself.

The only reason people complain about the F1 spoilers here on Jalopnik is because you announce the winner in the title. That's it. All you have to do is stop putting the results in the title/short description.

I agree that 'if you don't want spoilers, don't go online' - that's my strategy and I don't really care what you write because I won't see it. However, I don't think you can fairly compare the results of a sporting event with an election or news about the stock market... One is news, the other is not. Nobody cares

Haven't we had this discussion before? Yes we have; after the last time the F1 race results were spoiled on here. As I said then, to a certain extent, I agree, don't go to ESPN.com, or some other obvious site, but to say we should avoid the entire internet because a little thing like "life" got in the way of our

If this were called F1-nik I would agree with you, but perhaps there are other articles that I would like to read on this site; not to mention it might show up on Gawker or i09. No reason you need to put the spoiler in THE TITLE that gives me no choice about avoiding the article. It's not even that hard to avoid

No. Just no. It's the modern age, people don't watch much live any more. Treating everyone like they should watch live is just living in the past, and being an asshole.

People still use AIM? Good to know, I thought it was defunct.

Except that elections matter, and sporting events are comparatively irrelevant. Spoiling the results of a 1 AM EST Formula 1 race is akin to running though a bookstore at 12:01 AM yelling, "Snape killed Dumbledore!" You're not wrong, but you might still be an asshole.

Do you have a problem with an older woman driving a 556 horsepower RWD station wagon?

William Shatner was already waiting at the clubhouse with four bags of clubs.

Now playing

And here is WHY he deserves that respect. A few weeks before his death, he, Junior, Kelly Collins, and Andy Pilgrim pulled second in class and 4th overall at the 2001 Rolex 24 in the #3 C5-R.