Game 5 of the 1956 World Series.

Whether or not someone is deemed "responsible" is just a metaphysical clusterfuck. It's not relevant to my position. What's relevant is our reasonable expectations about the future.

What's the point of punishing someone who is literally incapable of changing? If someone is an unreformable, unrepentant monster, what's the point in acting as if they are somehow at fault for their severe psychological disability? You can either kill them like a rabid animal, or facilitate them living a more or…