Yoga pants always blow me away with how revealing they are.

Exactly.

No, it's called discussing the societal and moral balance between not being a shitty rape advocate but allowing offensive jokes to exist. I'm sorry you can't follow a comment directly related to something in the article but that's not my fault.

I did and plenty of people got it. Only those who twisted what I said into something to get mad about, didn't.

I didn't think it was remotely controversial, but I think people read it as me defending rape jokes when really I'm defending the right to make any offensive joke while not being Daniel Tosh who literally advocated for the rape of an audience member.

The knee thing is just me I assume and those with knee problems. It's just more comfortable to sit that way overall I think.

Sure, having something that can kill increases the likelihood you'll die from it. That's why those studies saying you're 2.7 times more likely to die from a gun of you have one in the house makes me laugh. It's like no shit! Owning a car makes it more likely ill get in a car crash too!

I didn't think a pretty straightforward and simple post would cause so many to go off the rails. I also rarely post here.

Thanks, at least I know I was making some sense!

You don't get this because for some reason you think for censorship to be discussed, it HAS to be happening. That's what 90 percent of the responses to my post are about.

I'm not "banging on" about it, I said it and had to explain it over and over and over to people like yourself who went insane and missed it!

If you read properly you'd see I never said anyone is banning jokes.

This is Jezebel. The site full of morons who overreact to things and get things wrong all the time! It happens on Gawker too though, I made a post when that British soldier was killed and had a hundred idiots scream at me because they misread my post.

Why, because I was totally right?

So he made a straw man despite it not being a straw man but rather a legit position on offensive jokes in comedy?

Do you not understand how you can speak hypothetically without the thing actually having happened?

Read my first post, I was perfectly clear. Stop jumping in to random threads at random points to assuage your obsession.

I love how you're literally just copying what someone else said, almost word for word.

Why do you keep repeating, insanely, that no is advocating for censorship when I never said anyone was (except for that one poster and random people in the world)?

I'm aware, and criticism is fine. Sadly, I've seen a lot of Americans say criminals shouldn't be defended (even disparaging the lawyers that represent them) should be tortured, that making fun of fat people should be illegal, etc.