because it wasn’t relevant to the situation, because it feels like a gotcha type of shit where they’re trying to catch people off guard, because it was settled privately and he wants to keep it private, because it’s in the past and as far as you know he’s already made up for it or maybe he hasn’t who knows

i mean,…

Not prudes. Political sharks, who select their targets based on how much it can amplify their voices, their runs for office, their careers, their followings - all while promoting themselves as fighting for ‘good’.

It’s written very well, but I feel that Cecilia went into the interviews expecting a #MeToo moment, didn’t get it, but didn’t adjust the tone of the article to fit. By all accounts, Atari seemed to be enjoyed by its employees, they felt engaged, and felt that promotions were merit based regardless of gender.

No, they weren’t foolish. They were completely ignorant and suffered a negative outcome as a result. That is two different things entirely. The corollary to your observation would be equally true: just because social norms have evolved from the 70s doesn’t mean that every single thing which happened under the 70s…

1. If you have anything good or meaningful to say, it’s going to piss SOMEone off. Doesn’t matter how or when you say it - somebody out there thinks it shouldn’t be said at all. That’s just a product of living in a diverse society. Do you let them silence you? Or do you shrug and say “tough titties”? There really is…

If you refuse to consider context, you construe negativity about any historical figure, event or commercial concern.

Agreed. I am often the first to pile on what is the oftentimes shoddy, clickbait “journalism” on the Gawkervision platform, so I should absolutely dole out the commendations when someone does a good job. This article was a compelling read and obviously well researched. I think I probably would have come to a more…

So basically the issue is a bunch of 21st century prudes who are judging the behavior of young people at a company 40 years ago by today’s standards, and for no apparent reason blaming the founder of that company for the industry problems of today.

Bragged about what tho? Being flirty half a dozen times in 1976? Looking back fondly at an exciting era of his life? God forbid. Nothing he did, no, EVERYTHING he did, combined, doesn’t amount to a hill of beans. No one was hurt or offended, and As this article evidences, the ladies who worked there look back at it…

To work in a time when men and women actually knew who they were sounds amazing.

Solid article. Enjoyed the various perspectives and views provided. History 101, don’t judge the past by today’s standards. Everyone seems to have forgotten this basic principle to studying events of the past.

 I just find it weird when people diss a game and completely forget all the qualities that made it such an amazing one in the first place.
I can assure you that DBFZ would not have been this popular if it was a 1v1 set up, that’s basically what killed off their last anime attempt with Fist of the North Star.

“Make it a complete game on release with an extra level of polish.”

For me, it’s almost entirely about the writing when I lament over Dead Rising going downhill. The first game had a weird, perfect fusion of oddity and grimness to it that held up to an extent in DR2, but disappeared afterward.

The timer encourages you to play the game multiple times and get better at the game. It’s not just that you only have a limited amount of time to play through the game; certain events only happen at a certain time, and you have to know about them and anticipate them in order to get the best ending.

If they didn’t take Dead Rising 4 in such a different direction than sales might have been better. I could live without Frank’s original voice actor returning. But removing open world and psychopaths killed a lot of what I enjoyed from the originals.

Long story short, Capcom has only themselves to blame for Dead…

Service animals and emotional support animals are not the same.

This kind of article has existed for decades and is known as a “trend-piece.”

But how else is the author going to show how intelligent he is and the depth of his understanding?!?!

But, seriously, I’m an attorney and I deal with some difficult to understand concepts pretty regularly. Some of them are difficult for people who are formally educated in law to understand, and many of them are…