Irrelevant and F you.
Irrelevant and F you.
You got me. I spend about 23 hours a day trying to prove to black people what a nice whitey I am, so naturally I live for posts like this.
"You are aware that the whole purpose of lipstick is to send a message of sexual availability by mimicking the inflamed vaginal labia of a primate in estrous, aren't you?"
Ethan Hawke's quote has been misspelled. He practices "monogame," which is a belief that women should be faithful to me but I can screw whomever I please. Initiations into this ancient sect generally occurs when young men reach the ages of 15 or 16, and membership lasts until the unfortunate day the shoe ends up on…
Totally agreed. Following the "anedoct path", as a person that relies more on social networks (i.e.: Raptr, Steam social stuff, etc) that in-game chats (since I play mostly single player games) for meeting people interested in video-games, I must say that the presence of girls in those is absurdly greater than the…
I don't shop at Victoria's Secret on my own (even though their major demographic is women). See how that looks stupid and ridiculous. Take notes kotaku.
In order for it to be a proven majority, you have to prove it. In order for it to be a solid majority, you have to define it.
I'm not sure I would have used the word "sexist". I'd probably have gone with "tone deaf".
Since we don't have access to their extensive statistics on their buying demographic, of course we make things up as we see them, silly person.
How can you claim with a straight face that "it's not insulting to female gamers" when you clearly are not one of them? Oversensitive or not, I'd say female gamers have a right to be put off by this. It's blatantly bad form.
Changing the red bits does nothing to change how it portrays gamers. I get that it's "supposed" to be funny. But it makes gamers look idiotic. If that's funny to you, fair enough, but you don't get to chastise me for thinking it's tone def at best and insulting to their customers at worst.
Jezebel arrives the same time as "1950's marketing guy" usually. Perhaps the problem should be stemmed?
To be fair, if I had to shag Charles Saatchi on the regular I'd probably be on something too.
As a female gamer I found it annoyed me reading that. Trust MS to be so condescending.
Horrible. This really doesn't have much place in 2013.
I don't knit, I sew. This is bullshit. Not all men knit damnit!
There are also animals where the female fucks all the guys, because then all the guys provide for her child because they all think it's theirs. That can easily fit into "women should sleep around" evopsych, but you're right - they'll never start with that hypothesis, which means they'll never craft studies…
I'm arguing that what the scientists are "concluding" is speculation. That's generally how it works - they come up with data and then try to find a conclusion to fit that data. In this case, because they're evolutionary psychologists, they decided that it had to be due to evolution. The problem with deciding that is…
What you're saying can be true, and still allow for promiscuity.