It's not just UK, I'd say nearly every European country has something like this.

This one is hard for me, seriously :D I had to push the difficulty down to easy like 40 hours in 'cause I made some bad decisions early on (like creating the exact same characters that will join you later as companions) and they came back to bite me later on and I really do not feel like restarting the whole thing…

Yeah but I do not feel like putting that much effort into that :D I'll end up picking a few and let the others decided about the rest, as always. Also I'm not exactly an action anime type of person so I kinda skip the ones that have action and mecha tags :)

But of course :D That's the one.

I'll be frank. Not a lot exciting stuff here (except one). Jinsei looks fun, Zankyou no Terror could be interesting, I'm not gonna watch the Persona anime 'cause I have yet to play the game... I guess I'll be watching Sword Art but that's "just 'cause".

It's true that this genre is not well represented on PC. The only SRPG game for PC I know of is God Catching Alchemist, and let's be honest, that game is not for everyone :D

Well and this is where we are going to disagree, story has maybe the biggest impact for me, if the game has no story, I won't play it 'cause game without story is basically just work to me.

Well on it's own sure, it's a dumb thing to say. But that's taking things out of context and that's not cool.

And from what part did you deduce I'm feeling like being catered to exactly? Well, never mind. I was reffering to this

To put it simply, there is no need for games to be diverse. There is only need for games to be good. This issue with diversity wasn't there previously 'cause there were a lot more things developers could improve on. Now, not so much, so people start looking around thinking, what else is there? And someone somewhere…

DA2 and Alpha Protocol are good. But if I had to add something else, then Final Fantasy 13, 13-2? I guess that qualifies, at least around here it does.

I guess that other guy was right, it's just not ment for me (but I still think his reasoning as to why may be something I don't really wanna know). In the end, my tastes are not really mainstream so that's understandable.

What it an issue where? I just expressed my personal opinion on the show, I'm not condeming anyone for liking it nor am I saying you shouldn't watch it because it's bad.

It may be so, but after reading this review (and not watchting the show), would you get that impression? I didn't, And I get it, that's why I'm not saying this one is bad, only that I didn't like it. I just think that the target audience is not as big as Richard makes it to be (or maybe I just wish it isn't). Oh yeah,…

I give them one thing, it looks nice, but that's it. Other than that, I did not like it at all. Dropped it after the episode with the angel because that one was just bull**** (and I mean that, I don't use words like this if I can really avoid it). So this magical world just happens to be on a planet that is identical…

And now, I'll have to leave the Internet for the next several months. I hate these people.

If you don't want to answer them then don't answer them. For the record, I do not have any other questions, nor do I plan to defend EA.

They did it twice and now it's a common practice?

Except they don't test the game, they play the game. They usually don't bother with reporting bugs 'cause "somebody else will do it". Unless it prevents them from playing the beta, than it's bad. I mean how dare they have bugs in beta?

I dunno, for me it's like... it's just trying to look really intelligent, but it isn't. In fact I dropped it after the episode with the "angel" 'cause that's what I call ********. The way they set her up, she shouldn't loos like she did, it made no sense. But I don't want to argue about No Game No Life, really. It's…