Saint Peter welcoming Carl:
Semeyaza
Semeyaza
After over 2 years of WFH due to COVID, my previous employer implemented a 2 days back in the office, 3 days at home. I found a new job and put in my notice within days. And surprise, that company is now fully back in the office 5 days a week, despite assurances at the time that 2 days would be the max. I’m fully…
I kind of don’t think so. It would simply have to be a different arc. Sokka’s views about women weren’t arbitrary. It’s actually tied to his role in the Southern Water Tribe, as well as Water Tribe culture in general, when it’s a key plot point later in the series. Plus, it’s almost the entire basis of his growth with…
This person is the poster child of all the inherently uninteresting, banal ‘influencers’ that somehow became mystifyingly famous in the past 10+ years. I’ve heard her talk, watched a stream- and to this day her appeal still escapes me.
This is a side effect of the left claiming that “context doesn’t matter” anymore for the better part of a decade.
Look at Disney’s last live-action reboot, The Little Mermaid, which rewrote Ursula’s iconic villain song “Poor Unfortunate Souls” to remove sexist lyrics (“The men up there don’t like a lot of blabber/They think a girl who gossips is a bore,” among others). Ursula’s problematic verse was a deliberate narrative…
but it’s not like they’re going to swing in the same direction as Marvel and make everything kind of self-aware and quippy. Right?
It’s a trippy and visually stunning film, despite some bad miniature FX here and there. If you’ve never seen it in a theater you owe it to yourself to do so.
Toxic nothing. There is nothing like tossing in a female lead, and making her out to be some “strong in the force” person that can go from being a scavenger to weilding a lightsaber in the span of 1 movie, while the general purpose of the first trilogy was to show Lukes journey from a farm boy to a a jedi strong…
The gender of a director is never an issue for me unless the movie revolves around intimate gender issues. Then maybe. A directer of the opposite gender can still pull off the movie if the story and the writing is exceptional. The director can then undertsand the elements of the movie.
Wow did you just tell Clinton to stay in her lane?
Am I the only one who find it a bit weird to call Barbie an “Adapted Screenplay” - like yeah, it’s a movie based on an existing idead, the Barbie toy, but it’s not adapted from an existing story, like a book or an animated movie. It’s an original story about something that already existed.
Dude, really, I admire your patience. But every argument pessimism made is obviously made in bad faith an indicates that they’re either trolling or like spreading toxicity, since the only thing they do is twisting everything to the point of illogicality while disregarding facts and commonly accepted notions. I don’t…
All the data suggests otherwise but you do you, I guess.
Yes, shame on them for making a critically and commercial successful game that millions of people (including non-Harry Potter fans) enjoyed. They should burn in hell!
Re-reading Kotaku’s review of the game- outlining how terrible it supposedly is, and the long debates around it in the comments section is hilarious in light of the fact that the game is actually well liked and apparently a lot of fun- is pretty hilarious these days. Kotaku’s obsession with messaging over actually…
Yet everyone here will continue burying their heads in the sand and insist that the twittersphere is indicative of reality.
Most critics who reviewed the game in good faith gave it a decent score. We get it you wanted the game to fail
T0 be fair to the outlets, people are dumb.