That's my thinking, too. I don't know how this whole "no beauty" thing is supposed to work.

I did read the last sentence. I also read all the sentences before it and came to the conclusion that the only issue you saw was the "poor phrasing" of that "fucking idiotic" statement.

I definitely agree as far as pure aesthetics are concerned.

I have. But they do not fulfill the most common beauty standard considering that the majority of people would be immediately less attracted to them as soon as they learn that the women are transwomen.

I'm very girly. I always wear dresses and pretty shoes and almost always zero makeup.

But that isn't "poor phrasing" or just stating a preference. Relating his desire for a date who would not wear heels or makeup to feminism is telling any woman who reads it that real feminists do not look a certain way. It isn't feminist for a man to tell a woman what a feminist looks like.

Question:

Yes. This. A thousand times.

Lol, me too.

Only vaguely related: