SavvyPerson
SavvyPerson
SavvyPerson

So you decided to BITCH about it... but of course you’ve NEVER used that GENDERED term ‘bitch’ to ‘describe bad behaviors that people of both genders do,’ and I’m SURE you call out people whenever they use that term!

Please get help. Or at least don’t take whatever it is you’re going through on the people around you.

‘YOU’ just like to argue, and ‘YOU’ lack reading comprehension. Yet again: THIS IS A RECURRING SERIES ON MONTHLY CHALLENGES. This is NOT a generic budget column. This isn’t about YOU (specific YOU) patting YOUrself on the back because YOU know how to budget. So what? THIS IS A SERIES ON MONTHLY CHALLENGES FOR PEOPLE

Sounds like a ‘you’ problem if you think that I’M being an asshole after your repeated refusal to understand the point of this series, simple because I made a general suggestion that the ‘royal you’ would benefit from reading other articles on budgeting first if they didn’t understand those basic concepts. But please,

No, you’re still missing the point. They have covered budgets seven ways to Sunday, they have covered detailed ones and high-level ones, and it isn’t what this monthly feature is about. This feature is specifically only about reducing a particular expenditure per month as a ‘challenge,’ not how to budget for it, not

Absolutely no one here gives a fuck about your opinion of what they do with their own goddamn face.

I think your comment is a bit presumptive, not to mention incorrect. This sample does not in any way represent a ‘majority’ of anything other than the white women they wanted to sample, so yes to it being lazy (‘convenient’) - but it doesn’t apply to ‘more’ people, because there are not more young white women on this

How can you not see a bias when the entire study a) presumes women are all attracted to men, b) assumes women care about wearing makeup solely for attracting men or to be considered attractive (and can’t possibly have any other motive to wear it), and c) assumes that only young and white women need to be ‘studied.’

You can easily do that kind of a breakdown with numerous tools and apps, but that’s not the point. This isn’t ‘how much can I afford to devote to that line item’ it’s ‘how much can I save by reducing an expenditure?’ Plus reducing the ‘can’ spend versus the ‘should’ spend means people can have more emergency savings

I think it’s incredibly reductive (not to mention sexist) to frame ‘parenthood’ as a woman-only endeavor. All of the symptoms you mention are NOT issues with ‘parenthood,’ they are issues with ‘giving birth’ which are NOT the same thing. You make no mention of the issues that all parents face (sleep deprivation, for

So it seems like it’d be easy enough for him to prove his claim that he ‘values diversity’ by his track record of hires - I double-dog-dare him to bring receipts on all of the ‘races, genders, creeds, and sexual orientations’ he’s hired, taking a point off for each one that’s the same as his. How low do you think that

Or, just get the black faux-fur throws that they have at Target that look like the matted black shawls already. Done!

Well, that’s your problem right there- you don’t understand what this article is about. It isn’t about deciding not to go shopping with someone, it’s about going and then being such a passive-aggressive manipulator that you whine and go off into some video game hut instead of either a) just not going in the first

Why do you think you can cherry-pick to define shopping to exclude ‘a quick trip to the grocery’ and Amazon? Why do you assume there isn’t some amount of practicality involved that might necessitate it being a joint endeavor (living in a rural area, one car, etc.)?

For one thing, it makes me a better person to try different experiences - some I may end up enjoying, others not so much. For another, I’m pretty sick of being the fucking errand runner when many of the things I go shopping for - food, toiletries, household goods, etc. - are not solely for me. Sometimes it also helps

Oh, fuck this take. I do things all the time that I don’t want to, and even manage to do them without bitching and moaning and rolling my eyes and sighing and whining to all my same-sex friends. These are things my husband enjoys, but I do not. And yet! I somehow survive.

Roast that jalapeño, or even better, roast a poblano. Yum!

But nothing was said about any increase or decline in the California parks, which might have been a better comparison.

Most Targets seem to carry Steaz, and it’s on Amazon

No one loses a ‘baby’ at that stage. An embryo or fetus, sure. But trying to pretend that an embryo is a ‘baby’ or ‘child’ is exactly the crap these anti-choice, anti-women nutjobs push.