SatyrixArt
Satyrix
SatyrixArt

Actually not at all. While it certainly seems like it’s made for a male gaze, it does a terrible job at it and misses the mark (at least for me). It’s like when a company makes pink tools and goes “hey LADIES, you all like PINK, right?” and it’s like okay, you’re trying to pander to a particular demographic, but you

I hope she shares her secret beauty routine!

It’s difficult to categorize, but it’s also difficult to categorize as a comedy.

It’s not quite as good as the admittedly very high bar of MTV’s other animated shows of the era, like Clone High, the Maxx, Daria or The Head, but it’s definitely not without its fun moments!

Well, “should” will likely always be a tricky thing, but a manager’s particular duties may depend less on paying active attention to the patrons and their needs, so it’s hard to say that they should be able to check their phones on a 1:1 ratio.

When you get down to it, the problem is that they legislated technology in 1791. I’ll read up on Miller vs US, it sounds interesting.

So what would change if it wasn’t there? The other amendments don’t have little motivations that don’t mean anything.

Unfortunately, God’s away on business and it’s up to us to help each other. Where others saw dirt, you saw a seed in need of water. If everyone did that, people would be doing alright.

Coercion is a thing, but you’re adding an element of fear to the author’s story that she didn’t put there. She portrays the man as a whiny baby, but she makes zero indication that there would be any kind of “consequences” or violence if she refused. In fact, she indicates that the worst case scenario she envisioned

You’re suuuper diminishing Sarah Silverman here. She’s not some unknown name, she carries a lot of weight.

As an unabashed male pervert, the cover does nothing for me. Maybe if she looked like she was into it. Instead, it reminds me of someone doing a lesbian scene because they really needed the $200 or of Dracula’s brides, taking me for an effete idiot fop and trying to lure me into some sort of really obvious trap with

If you’re a mainstream artist, you’re an influencer.

Just as a lurker in this thead, I find your ability to show patience and understanding to ignorance (and I don’t mean that as a slight to the OP, he came hat in hand, wanting to understand something better and that’s commendable, even if it was maybe somewhat clumsy,: just the literal definition) to be inspiring. I’m

-Sweetie, if you catch on fire, you should stop, drop and roll.

But, how is the server the equivalent of my boss?

but we do not (and should not) expect the same sort of single-minded focus from other professions

What’s TRULY weird is that no other amendments have little meaningless flavor texts like the 2nd amendment (supposedly) does. Every other amendments’ words are important and deliberately chosen, but for some inscrutable reason, the 2nd amendment might as well say “I could sure go for some pastrami for lunch and the

Holy shit, I’ve found the other person on the internet who remembers Spy Groove!

But that doesn’t change the fact that Indian people did not like the depiction of one of their revered heroes, a clone or not.