Wallet: Choose your prices carefully, Gabe. They may be your last as king.

What I'm personally worried about is developers deliberately shoehorning things into games because of political correctness concerns. I'm all for more females in games as long as it's done right. Don't self-censor and water down the work, don't subtract by addition. That does a disservice to both female and male…

I'd have expected something like this from Philly fans, but from Brazil? Shaaaaaaaaame.

It's RAW! There's still fucking spores in it! You fucking donkey! You'll kill someone!

Miss Finster, Gretchen's swearing!

"Astonishingly, Nintendo's complaint before the World Intellectual Property Organization has been denied. The company was trying to get control of WiiU.com, which was registered back before even the Wii existed: Jan 13, 2004."

The PROTECT Act of 2003 does make it illegal and there have been a few prosecutions for it, all of them have involved VERY hardcore hentai with characters who were clearly children, and all of those but one have also involved the people having real life stuff as well. However, circuit courts HAVE taken out some parts…

I must admit I have gotten pretty combative with people over this as I'm a fierce advocate of free speech rights so I can be aggressive when debating on the subject. I don't think that advocating for the legalization of drawn depictions of sex between minors is attempting to advocate for pedophiles as a protected…

Well, here we have the argument of fear of other people vs. fear of the government. I'm not scared of pervs fapping to Dora the Explorer in their basement, I'm scared of the government getting so powerful that you won't be able to say anything without being locked up or worse. I'm in agreement that this stuff is…

I could actually dispute that in our primal nature violence is also inevitable. Look at the war and murder between chimpanzees or what the Cro-Magnon men did to the Neanderthals. Hell, look at the entire 20th Century when we nearly blew ourselves to smithereens. Aggression is a natural part of our evolutionary…

That is the EXACT same argument that people use when trying to ban violent video games. The exact same one. And yes people do like what they're acting out in those games but it doesn't escalate. What makes violence and sex any different? Would you honestly say that someone who gets his jollies exclusively from…

But it's all right to ban a sexual drawing of a character who looks like a child even if they're depicted in context as an adult? Again, you'd explicitly be banning the depiction of a discrete fictional situation within a story and a category of speech, and banning any category of speech sets a disturbing precedent.

Morally and ethically you're right, but LEGALLY is another matter and you're treading really dangerous waters when you start putting people in jail or even requiring court-mandated therapy for drawings or any kind of speech for that matter. Banning something because of someone's thoughts or feelings about it crosses…

The problem with that is that you can have a real life consenting adult who looks like a child, but you can't draw a character who looks like a child but is a consenting adult. You say the "1000 year old vampire" excuse should be dismissed but there ARE adults in real life who appear much younger. You would be…

Actually it does, considering that a real picture involves the abuse and victimization of a real child whereas a drawing of a fictional character involves the abuse and victimization of no one.

Freedom of speech doesn't just mean freedom of PLEASANT speech. You've got to defend the ugly, sickening, and offensive stuff too because one day someone might come into power who attaches those labels to legitimate political speech.

There is again the ethical quandary of adults being able to legally have sex with adults who look like children while drawings of fictional children in sexual situations are illegal. Would you also ban any adult who looks like a child from having sex?

So where would you draw the line to avoid ambiguity? I imagine you couldn't ban drawings of any teenage characters since there's too many chances of them being mistaken for adults. It'd have to be absolutely utterly unmistakable that it's a child character and that it's obscene.

You honestly believe that drawing underage fictional characters is as dangerous as shouting fire in a crowded theater? That it poses the same imminent risk of danger as causing a stampede would be? It has to be an IMMINENT risk to meet constitutional scrutiny.

Reigned in? You sound like you don't like the First Amendment.