RustyShitboxIsTheNewFast
RustyShitboxIsTheNewFast
RustyShitboxIsTheNewFast

Yep, that’s a trade person for sure. Normally the truck is more than a little dirty, so getting into it with clean clothes is not really an option.

Yes! Well put, I was trying to figure out how to say it, the harder that you can constantly drive the more suitable the car is for the situation. I would say about 120hp for the 2100lb Civic I have is just about right. Is it the most insane track beast ever? No. But I can drive it about as hard as it can take pretty

Fite me.

Anti-pedant actually.

The barracuda came out before the Mustang, negating the Mustang defining the class. And the class name was defined by Ford itself, its like saying band-aid is the official name of an adhesive bandage. That, and the whole “if people use the word that defines it” thing. Oh and your dictionary definition of muscle car

Car size is based on wheelbase. A full-size is anything above 110". Your right on a falcon since the wheelbase is 109.5", half an inch short of a full-size, and was originally called an intermediate full-size. A mid-size is from 105"-110". Now guess what a Mustang is? 108". That makes it a mid-size.

A Mustang is a mid size man, it was always classified as one. It was a mid-size to the Falcons full-size. My years of learning still seems to have done me well, and your out here proving my points for me. What a world we live in.

2 doors, 4 seats, comes with a v8, yes yes, that perfectly describes a Mustang!

Lots of people also being wrong, doesn’t make it right

Without definition, they are simply words. I read on an article here that AMG makes the last muscle cars, despite the thousands of ways you could debate that statement. Is it incorrect? No, because the term is without definition.

He’s arguing for one point, I am arguing for the non-validation of that same point, not a contrasting counter-point.

Who decides what is the correct terminology? Is it a shouting pedant or the majority of people that use the language? My point wasn’t that he is incorrect, just that he is correcting someone who is correct in his own right.

The point is the 9/10 people don’t say that, and language is a function of the population using it. Without a true, authoritive definition, you’re arguing an opinion. Good for you.

No, I have a lifetime of learning to resource to.

“Not all Scots”

As you continue to be a pedantic asshole. Way to take the high ground.

It’s like if they could come to a place like this and not be affronted by a bunch or pedantic assholes derailing the context of civil discussion with their narrow views of terminology.

Is it them, or is it you? Public perception trumps pedantic pickiness. Without a dictionary or truely decisive definition source all mustangs are muscle cars to the majority of people. Hence, your argument is invalid.

Don’t be a pedantic ass, I grew up in the era they were popular, the Mustang was commonly know as a muscle car. Really only car guys even use the term pony car.

There was a 575 sitting beside the hologram Lamborghini. So I will politely disagree.