That’s what I’m saying
RossEnzo
RossEnzo
Wasn’t that true with the clown-shoe BMW Z3 M Coupe of the 90s?
Some would argue the SLK55 AMG is a better choice then the SL55 AMG. The little SLK has the same 5.4 liter though the SLK lacks the supercharger making it normally-aspirated.
Some would argue the SLK55 AMG is a better choice then the SL55 AMG. The little SLK has the dame 5.4 liter normally-aspirated engine as the SL, excluding the supercharger. But it more than makes up for loss of power with an all around lighter and nimble chassis.
Screw VW! It’s time people receive the justice they deserve!
I guess jalopink died with Gawker.. This is not the Jalopink I remember.
WHY ISN'T THIS A THING?
Typical uninformed liberal.... sigh
996 Turbos go for $35k-$65k 996 911s $25k-$40k
That's cool bro, but I worked hard so I could by my own C63 and I couldn't afford to do that when I was in high school. And I don't think the Jalopink readers really care to hear about how spoiled you are.
Everything you talked about was a problem on the early cars, try a 2009 and newer. Specifically the the Vantage S!
Disgree, honestly the best E46 M3 has three-pedals
2005 Mercedes-Benz C55 AMG - It will actually be a decade this coming November from when I ordered this baby. Maybe I'll do a review soon!
I approve of this
I was about to say the same thing! Goodbye E63 and outrageous out of warranty repairs, Hello 707HP and tire shredding goodness
RUN THE OTHER WAY AS FAST AS YOU CAN!
The C55 AMG is such an underrated car
Hey! My C55 is as fast as a R32 GTR around the ring! good to know!!
0-60 in 3.6 seconds, fits five in luxury, can defiantly tow a boat. Sure it doesn't have the ground clearance of the Gelandewagen or other SUVs but whose cares, you have 577 horsepower at your disposal!