RosaleenBan
RosaleenBan
RosaleenBan

Generally speaking, if you are around 200 feet away behind jet when it is taking off, your ears are getting blown apart by a SPL of roughly 120, which is what is known as the “threshold of pain”—the point at which you suffer irreversible hearing damage. So, even those dolts that manage to pull this stunt and live,

At 57, she is ineligible for a Darwin award. Her untimely death does not affect any future contributions to the gene pool.

There is literally nothing sad about this.

I tried to woo a girl with Silverchair patch on her bookbag by showing off my knowledge of  The Silver Chair, fourth book of the Chronicles of Narnia. I didn’t know Silverchair was a band.

The real issue is that someone is getting called out for wearing gloves while handling and giving out food.

Since wearing gloves while distributing food is apparently now racist, was Twitter equally quick to drag this racist?

Let me get this straight: people flip their shit if the motherfucker at Chipotle doesn’t wear gloves while preparing their burrito, but this woman gets shit on for wearing them while serving hungry kids? Do I have that right?

Okay, let’s be clear that she certainly should have taken the gloves off when she started talking to people and posing for photos after handing out food, but did you guys really only pull the images of her wearing gloves while she was handing out food and while they were eating (which mean she’d probably JUST been

Why “Internet Atheists,” which has a negative connotation? Are the Catholics commenting not “Internet Catholics?” This is a good example of how people often talk about atheists in a negative way, while theists are just “normal.”

But they are all fictional. So if people want to follow Harry Potter or Cthulhu, those options are no less legitimate than older offerings.

I mean, I feel like if you get two old rabbis in a room and ask them what the nature of God is, you’ll get five hours of discussion, ten bad jokes that are somehow way more smutty than you’d think, and at the end of it both sides will have somehow switched position and be arguing just how wrong their old views were.

No major religion, and certainly none of the Abrahamic options, are designed to welcome curious, articulate, critical thinkers

I for one welcome our new world where aunt May is hot.

Never saw anyone do this, but as someone who frequents the sames place multiple times a week I would be offended and say something to embarrass them. Probably let the staff know (loud enough for the other person to hear) that any time they insult or delay the other guest 5 minutes I will tip an extra 5%.

Smart move. You dodged a figurative bullet with that one.

Saw a new car in my parking lot. Truck, Arkansas plates, “One nation under GOD” “MAGA” and (my favorite) “Info Wars” bumper stickers.

But the whole point of an annulment is that the information a partner lied about was essential in the choice between marrying them or not. It’s not just the lying itself, it’s not having enough information to make that choice. Getting an annulment because someone lied about their sexuality only happens if the person

I really do not understand why mainstream / liberal networks continue to bend over backwards to court conservatives. Between this hot garbage and CNN continuing to place the most ludicrous conservative voices on Anderson Cooper 360... I hate to look at “trusted” news anymore.

So when you hear two conflicting opinions on the internet, instead of assuming that those opinions might’ve come from different people, your first assumption is that literally every single person held the first opinion and they are now contradicting themselves.

I’m sure some people looking to sell their shitty homes stumbled upon this and complained to Zillow about it.