RodgerRodger
RodgerRodger
RodgerRodger

Super unclear that law will apply. It comes down to complex federal choice of law. Nba will claim staff of ny based corp first acted based upon ny broadcast and kicked him out in Ny. As Donald has confirmed the statement to the nba and addressed them publicly, I can see how he excludes all of it even if ca law

The hypothetical but almost unicorn-ish sports violate the anti-trust statue suit as filed by an owner that expressly waived his right to bring such a suit. (They probably do.). He will most likely file in fed court, get demurred and sent to arbitration per his agreement with NBA. After that is over, the pariah with

Ironically, unions will most likely opt for the $5,000 stipends the power conferences want to further separate from the pesky teams that pop up. At best, the top players can get access to a set number of second tier stipends. These unions aren't going to be comprised solely of 3-4 hoops players and 5-20 football

Espn : Tebow = Deadspin : college kids should be paid.

No, the author is. They've chopped out women's sports, where a few schools have some major revenue on the ground they don't make enough profit. That's not the NLRB's test and using that test to the larger system leads to absurd outcomes.

According to Frampton, meanwhile, the answers to the two most salient issues here are fairly straightforward. Title IX implications were dealt with pretty succinctly in a recent piece in The New York Times. ("The rights of workers in the highly commercialized college sport entertainment industry ought not to be

The New York Tired, Poor Shooting, Huddled Masses, Yearning to Breathe Free

I'm confused. How does Smith expect Aaron Hernandez to get to Bank of America Stadium for a Panthers game?

Lolo may be a virgin but she sure is an attention whore.