The sales statistics say otherwise.

Who ya talkin' bout? Hope it's the Bimmer, as I've got a 98 C5 sittin in the garage...they came out in 97

The most unfortunate Tuner acronym evar.

And airplanes almost always never fall out of the sky. My (overly subtle) point is this: We DO make every attempt to keep bad things from happening...and yet, they still do. So having a group of people working on the recovery aspects is a good thing.

And this is why graphs without errorbars are misleading! Stats are hard, kids, leave it to the professionals.

Because shit happens...and somebody's gotta clean it up.

My kid's Godfather has a Volvo just like that! Sucker weighs almost nothing.

People made buggy whips long after the car took off, too.

Based on this weekend's sales...there's a lotta people distorting reality and logic...how would you explain that?

Needs more anodized chrome, and it needs to be attached to something with cajones.

You've come a long way.

Not this time. :/

I can't wait for the mythbuster's test on chain-reaction car explosions...

(In case nibbles eats it: [www.millertwinracing.com] )

What gets me is that these are DOWNSAMPLED. I haven't seen one yet that's the 3XXX by 2XXX the camera can produce.

The Wife and I bought a 98 Corvette in 1998 (used, 9000 miles) it was $42,000. 5 long years of $800 a month payments (plus taxes and insurance)

Can those that have a sequential shifter have an additional dose of smug?

Well, except for that whole Mercury thing.

B Grade Science Fiction movies - the Wikipedia of the Entertainment world!

He's human...with human wants and needs.