The Supreme Court has not ruled on homosexuality being a suspect class, meaning there is no precedent.

Look, Nancy, I'm not wrong. You're unfamiliar with the levels of scrutiny given to the constitutionality of laws. Go to law school, as I did, or read up: gays and lesbians have not been considered a suspect class by the Supreme Court; laws impacting them are today subject only to the lowest level of scrutiny. …

...and people like you of course that I'm not a fan of.

Oh, go fuck yourself - I watch maybe four races a year... Hardly a huge fan. You, however, perpetuate an F1 fan: you're an elitist, conceited asshole who thinks anything besides open wheel is the white trash ("hockey") of motorsport.

And tiers of F1 are part of F1, fuckwad. Aside from dirt, spirit car racing, a lot of oval, stock car racing is associated with NASCAR. Duh. It's uniquely American.

Oh, for fuck's sake. Let's continue this Dance of the Tards... Is there passing in F1? Sure. Enough to make the fucking races interesting? Numerous passes for the LEAD? NO! Can someone come from qualifying P20 and win? NO! In NASCAR? Yes, and then some. But, please, let's continue. This is awesome.

The problem with your argument is that it's not an Equal Rights Clause, it's an Equal PROTECTION Clause (an Equal Rights Amendment for women never got far). No way around that. And just because liberal judges have misinterpreted the strict meaning of that clause doesn't make your argument right.

And they're all losing. I focus on who's in the hunt for winning the race, as that's the goal in all of auto racing. I don't care who's racing like mad for one measly championship point.

How many others out there? Well, there are the lower tiers of NASCAR, you putz. There are also dirt track ovals. The Sprint Cup of NASCAR is the pinnacle of oval racing. F1 guys like you are always such condescending assholes.

Simply put, you don't understand the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution if you don't understand my last sentence and how it relates to my analogies. They're directly on point. Re-read them. If you still don't understand, sashay yourself off to law school and then get back with me.

Obscure! +1

They're totally different cars and the drivers come from completely different backgrounds. NASCAR is the pinnacle of oval, stock car racing. F1 the pinnacle of open wheel. You do NOT see plenty of open wheel drivers in NASCAR. JPM is the only one who made it last very long and he wasn't successful except for a couple…

Define a "shit ton." There are more passes for the LEAD in the first quarter of a NASCAR race than an entire F1 race. I've tried to watch F1 (granted, the race times are hard to catch live), and it's boring. Whoever takes P1-3 in qualifying usually wins. Yawn.

So you supposedly stopped watching the more entertaining racing series (they actually pass and rub in NASCAR) because of fights (this is the second time all year?) and because oval racing is "boring as fuck." What do you call F1, where, admittedly, the pole winner often wins, there is little passing, and little drama?…

Dammit. Posting on my phone; my reply was supposed to be for the OP. Disregard, sorry.

So you supposedly stopped watching the more entertaining racing series (they actually pass and rub in NASCAR) because of fights (this is the second time all year?) and because oval racing is "boring as fuck." What do you call F1, where, admittedly, the pole winner often wins, there is little passing, and little drama?…

Umm, no, Mr. Condescending Dick. Equal protection doesn't apply and your "logical step" isn't so.

Sorry, but these articles are "No shit" kind of posts.

That's not a civil right.

It was under $3/gal here two weeks ago, but my Audi takes premium. Still, it was $3.21/gal and it was only $45 to fill up from near empty. I never thought I'd see it under $3/gal again. One of my best friends lives in SC, so I get gas updates from him - our gas tax up here is a lot higher than yours. :/