Tell me about. We had a bunch of students in business school who decided to use Prezi for every...damn...presentation.

God I hate Prezi. It seems to make people think that an innovative presentation is synonymous with giving people motion sickness.

what, you don't get jifts on your birthday?

Also, if someone says "jif" I still think of the peanut butter. "Gif" means nothing but the filetype.

If GIF stood for giraffe interchange format, you might have a point.

The summary should add a bullet to PNG for alpha transparency. I'd say that's PNG's killer app.

Why is this hard for people? He defined the pronunciation in the spec, so it should be followed.

Last year, on the TWiT network, it was revealed that the creator wanted it to sound like "jif", however because the internet at the time by and large got comfortable saying "Gif" he capitulated and ultimately expressed no interest in correcting people.

Because removing the T from gift doesn't change the sound of the G.

Yeah, dude, those gigantic giraffes have a hard g, too, right?

The infographic was saved as a jpeg when it should have been png...

Considering the G stands for "Graphics" which in turn the word graphics is the same kind of G that when pronounced should be GIF and not JIF.

GIF with a hard 'G'. Regardless of what the creator thinks, the G in Graphics is hard so it's only appropriate to say GIF with a hard G. I don't know anyone who says "JIF" (probably because they know I would disown them).

Shut up. Hard "g" GIF. I don't care what the creator of the .gif says, if he wanted "jiff" he should have galled them .jif. PERIOD.

As someone who was a teenager a year ago, I want to stress a few things:

I would suggest the exact opposite. Android Studio is running pretty damn well, last I checked, and using eclipse is sort of like using one of those swiss army knives with 80 attachments - sure it does literally everything, but its pretty clunky to use. Not to mention, android is basically a plug-in, integration isn't…

I disagree with you, using Android Studio has been stable for some time now, especially with the "update stable only" option. Wasting your time on an outdated studio(eclipse)/environment is not worth it. Learn it right the first time and with Google's support(and the rest of the people using the help forums)... there…

I disagree with you, using Android Studio has been stable for some time now, especially with the "update stable only" option. Wasting your time on an outdated studio(eclipse)/environment is not worth it. Learn it right the first time and with Google's support(and the rest of the people using the help forums)... there…

I totally second BanZZai on that. Android Studio is getting really close to perfectly usable and will become the standard better way to develop Android apps. Sooner or later you'll probably have to switch...

Can't say that I agree with that statement. Android Studio is the recommended IDE and by very far superior to Eclipse as far as I'm concerned. I can't think of specific AS issues, but the idea of getting familiar with Eclipse and getting stuck in it by habit doesn't sound enjoyable at all...