I was just making a joke about that movie yesterday... Glad I'm not the only one who didn't forget how underwhelming and bad that movie was.

Worst part is... I would probably actually buy/drive the Geely Roller.

I actually don't mind that car...

Odd thing is the Chery QQ looks better.

FACT: Honda has lost its way.

The Chrysler 200 I'm looking at has a tame 283 hp... but I'm hoping it gets the power boost in 2013 the base 300's did with the same engine.

Honey, I have 3 cars. My husband has 2 more.

What engine did the Bloated-Seal era SHOs have?

BLACK PLASTIC CLADDING!!!!! This isn't 1997 anymore, auto-makers! Knock that shit off.

RAV4 never came into this conversation... Go away homeless man.

1987 Plymouth Reliant coupe EV... I would buy the f*ck out of that car... and then I'd jerk-off all over it.

Same here.

I'm in Iowa, where we all pretty much HAVE TO commute to work...and/or do anything. Fun or not.

The Volvo is also entry-level luxury, and the Mazda is economy-car-chintz.

Yes! YES! SO DEAR GOSH YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'd prefer an electric grocery-getter.

...and I would be truly shocked if GM spent enough money on creating the ELR/Provoq to not make it a hatch/lift back.

Hatchback, fastback, notchback, Kamm-back, bubble-back, liftgate/liftback...

Do you have the 3.0 Vulcan V6? They were competent cars—and I've fully stated that for a cheaper than dirt beater car during the winter, you can't go wrong with a bloated seal era Taurus/Sable WITH the 3.0 V6. The 3.8 is a trouble-maker and expensive to repair. The 3.0 is predictable regarding its problems—always…

Is it going to be a coupe or a 2-door hatchback?