Nah, that would be silly as that’s obviously not that part of your take that is progressively biased.

Well so much for Jalopnik... this used to be an objective place with interesting automotive news and stories. We get it, the entire G/O media group is on the left and hammers visitors with progressive hot takes daily, but c’mon please keep Jalopnik free of garbage takes like this. Gizmodo was lost ages ago, but now J…

Damn thieves need to stop stealing my crap, while we’re at it.

99% of your takes on here are shit. This is just another one. If a guy is going to run from the cops with stolen plates then he’s going to do more to stay free. Or the cops don’t pursue people so they rob us at gun point and the cops don’t chase them for shit. Then the criminal is free to do what he wants because…

They then allege he ran “several stop lights” before jumping on Interstate 17 and eventually heading west on I-10 toward California.

The latest round is definitely diminishing returns. Essential businesses cannot conduct non-essential sales, even though the customers are already there. There is zero benefit from not letting a store sell me paint or gardening supplies if I’m already in the store buying groceries.

I’m not a conservative. I can, and do, think for myself. I also don’t need any seeds so I have no dog in this fight. Since you seem to need it spelled out for you, there are entire websites dedicated to this type of political BS. This shouldn’t be one of them.

A resulting Great Depression from stay at home orders could easily kill as many or more compared to Covid 19. Many State Governors are picking winners and losers when shutting down their respective States.  There has to be a point of diminishing returns on Stay At Home orders. 

Ah, yet another political article telling other people how bad they are and assuming their intelligence because they disagree with you.

This is some of the most desperate “the Koreans are just copying the Germans” BS I’ve seen, and I’ve seen a ton of it.

uhhhehhh the P1's my first choice, then the 675lt

Going to the moon was the most astonishing human achievement.

I can tell you what it said, Raph.

Ummm no. They were driving in an HOV lane. It’s not a passing lane. The sedan was driving slightly faster than the car to their right in the passing lane, which is totally fine. They could have eventually moved over for the Focus but the Focus gave them hardly any time to do so and instead passed them.

Some days, you need a good memory, and this song is one.

If you have to “instantly” grab the steering wheel and take back control, it’s worse than no automation. The temptation is simply too great for lazyasses to be lulled by the car doing the driving. Something will happen and yet again, it’ll be more wrecks occurring that were avoidable.

Unavoidable my ass! Having found the video, if these self driving cars are supposed to have such sophisticated sensors it should totally have been able to detect her in time to avoid her, or at least make an attempt.

“ The police department’s preliminary investigation indicates the car made no attempt to brake.”

The Uber crash highlights a couple of important points. First, hard rules don’t work for autonomous cars. Google’s cars are paralysed by people that don’t come to a complete stop at a 4-way stop, and now Uber’s car couldn’t deal with a pedestrian that wasn’t in a crosswalk. These are basic things that are easy for a…