EXACTLY what a PT droid would say

This shit is still easier to figure out than BMW’s lineup.

Now, although the article makes it very clear that the *proposed* governmental-imposed speed limiter quite clearly doesn’t apply to passenger vehicles in the USA (it’s the ATA who are looking to bring everyone down to the same common denominator), what would be your practical response if it did?

Your responsibility to keep the road safer outweighs your opinion of thinking you’re going fast enough, so people behind you must wait.

Your post should be printed on giant billboards.

Anti science? You should then write about the peer reviewed scientific research that shows this to be false.

Actually, to say that we should test things objectively with the scientific method seems quite pro-science.

Science? Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure entitled “Why children absorb more microwave radiation than adults: The consequences.”

You are spinning her comments for click-bait which is a disservice to journalism.

“When people say stupid anti-science shit, Gizmodo writes about it 5 months later”

The effect of screen time on social/cognitive development isn’t bullshit. In fact, this article of yours is exactly what you’re claiming her to be: anti-science. You could have at least touched on the effects of screen time if you’re going to include it in her quote.

Toyota Celica S3

BMW E28