Err....Santa came to my house when I was a kid. He’s definitely white. And he had the same glasses as my dad. I guess it was the style at the time.

Awe man, I'd have killed for a bit of variation in my dolls' bodies! Just for the variety! Though this would greatly complicate one's clothing collections.

Oh, he’ll be branded as crazy, alright. White men who commit mass shootings are always “mentally ill.” Men of color are just labelled as “thugs.”

KKHHAAAAAN NOOOOOO

As a medical student, I’m all for appreciating nurses and recognizing how much work they do. That said, is it possible to appreciate one part of the healthcare system without putting down another? I guarantee you that most doctors have spent time reading about you before their “perfunctory appearance” and spent much…

Full disclosure, I haven't read Watchman and it's probably been nearly decade since I read Mockingbird, but I kind of thought this too when I first read about all the outrage regarding Atticus revealed to be a racist. I mean, especially for the time, it does not strike as strange or uncommon for there to be a…

Yes. Great shouting though.

Raped? Knitter, please.

This is exactly what the Religious Freedom Act is supposed to protect. People doing works of charity, wearing the garb required by their religion, etc., without the burden of the government.

Fucking Jarheads never learn. Here's another one raising some other dude's kid.

Baby Command Center! Yes!! This is what it's being called forevermore.

THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM GIANT PICTURES OF THE NERDLET!!

OMG THE CUTENESS!! I can't deal. He is just too adorable. That face!!

I'm trying to convince myself to like that 5am wake up call - I'm a sucker for snuggles!

I did think about it. I still don't agree. You're chalking up me dismissing your point as a cis person trying to talk over a transgender person, when in reality I'm dismissing your point simply because it's a bad one.

There's someone in this debate that doesn't appear to be listening or thinking before she responds.

To add to your point, I was also quoting verbatim Saks' motion, which uses the term "protected class," and making a legal counterpoint. Soooo....yeah. I'm not really sure where the outrage is coming from with this one. This might be the most pointless debate I've ever gotten into.

I understand, and that sounds unbelievably frustrating. What I don't understand is your actual objection. Being part of a protected class has nothing to do with being "normal" or not.

Sigh. Again, I was literally quoting from Saks' motion and from the language of the ACTUAL LAW at issue in the case. It's not an assumption that you don't understand, it's a fact, seeing as how you don't understand. I don't know how else to try to explain it. You seem intent on being offended or thinking I'm being…