Yes, but Bynes spends a fair amount of her time on Twitter spewing hate and attacking people who've done nothing to her. What the hell was that shit she said to Rhianna? First she says that Rhianna deserved to be beaten by Chris Brown, then she said he beat her into a bloody pulp because she was "not pretty enough."…

Why doesn't Courtney Love tell Bynes to lay off Rihanna and stop making fun of her being a victim of domestic violence? I don't think someone who relies on calling people ugly and tells someone who was savagely beaten that she got beat up because she's not pretty enough can be called a "beautiful and talented person."…

How did she find out that her mother slipped into her own medical charity for pain pills and benzos?

Good old John McCain! He's always out there looking for a war to start.

This is Hanson covering Optimistic.

NME gathered the best Radiohead covers and their corresponding youtube clips. Biggest shocker? HANSON did a good cover of "Optimistic." I know, right? Tears for Fears did "Creep" justice. I wasn't impressed with Prince's version of the song. Anyway, check it out.

I don't have a FB account, but I'd friend her if I could. Her fellow atheist stands with her.

The FOP of Philadelphia provides legal services to retirees. I looked at their website and that's under their benefits. I don't know why, but they do.

Aside from changing your mind and contacting him, whatever decision you make will be the best one. If your university does not abide by the Clery Act guidelines by providing information regarding their policies on campus violence and harassment, go to student services and get one. Bring a print out copy of the Clery…

I know other people have said this to you, but you owe that man nothing but a lawsuit. First of all, if your college receives any federal money for financial aid, it is in violation of U.S. Code of Federal Regulations at 34 C.F.R. 668.46, also known as The Clery Act. It imposes a positive duty on all colleges and…

This person was saying that the government makes money off of bail and courts set it high in order to make money. I wasn't saying bail cannot be revoked post-conviction, just that the court can't take the money for itself. Revoking bail, is and of itself, a way of discharging the bail. You get it back once you've been…

Indeed, he was permitted to retire. That means he may be eligible for having his legal expenses and/or being bonded out by the FOP. I know they extend benefits to retirees with a pension, so his not being an active duty officer could possibly not disqualify him for that. The PBA and FOP are like those "charities" that…

Not so. So long as a defendant attends each court ordered appearance and complies with the other terms of the bond, the bail is discharged the moment the case has been settled. An acquittal, a guilty verdict, or an outright dismissal of the charges absolves the defendant of the bail. If a person is out on bail and…

Except that you're totally wrong on the facts, rendering any so-called "logic" moot. Logic based on a false presentation of facts (bail scheduling, statutes, and Supreme Court rulings) is, in and of itself, faulty.

No, he doesn't have an affirmative right to bail. In 1987, the SCOTUS ruled in United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 107 S. Ct. 2095, 95 L. Ed. 2d 697, that no one has an absolute right to bail and that remanding someone to custody is not a violation of due process.

Yes, you can remand a defendant to the department of correction without bail. The Supreme Court has deemed that a suspect does not have an absolute right to bail. Some crimes are automatically no bail/bond like crimes that qualify for capital punishment.

It's nice to see that even though he has a history of domestic violence, shooting into a crowd in order to enact a revenge killing of a suspect, and shot a second man despite there being witnesses that vindicate the victims, he was only forced to retire when he turned his violence on another cop. Beating up a…

Not in this field. And Grey's was more "groundbreaking" at the time than Scandal. Grey's won on novelty, in my opinion, and I cannot recall the last time it was nominated. Scandal is a less tight version of Grey's in its best times. Shonda's game is old hat. It is entertaining, but not award worthy. The writers…

This is exactly how I feel. It is entertaining but the writers don't take writing and plotting seriously, so I don't either. I don't think anyone else should.

Well, I don't think it deserves major respect. It is entertaining, nothing more. Come on, they don't even do basic research, the plot holes are huge, the unfurling of the narrative is done in the most immature manner, and the acting isn't good. Goldwyn may have acted alongside Cranston, but plenty of bad/mediocre…