"It's complicated"

Yeah, I wasn't sure if it was TT.. That sounds sick!

Not anymore, this has a turbine! TT V12 engines sound ludicrous. Take the 65 AMG power units as an example. Insane!

5 things I have to say about this concept:

I am talking about the balance between practicality and appeal. A car that is only meant to be driven is useless to me and many other people. An Alfa 4C can't compete with a Challenger as it is neither that fast, nor practical at all. Furthermore, I brought up the Lotus Elise example because it is a much more popular…

I don't have any basis? Let's see, the Challenger has a trunk, 4 seats, more power and sounds better. What does the 4C have? A carbon tub(which doesn't justify why it isn't that much lighter than a Lotus Elise), no storage space whatsoever, no power steering, a puny little engine that I can get on a much more…

Yeah.. Pity.. If the Viper was maybe 70 grand, more people would buy it, but this is a longer debate that was already covered in a Jalop post a few weeks ago..

The 4C is crap.. Come on.. a car that is so overpriced for what it offers that it makes me buy a Lotus Elise instead and still have cash for something else.

Does it come with training wheels, in case it flips?

Why not a threesome? Hellcat, Nismo and AMG?

A bit retarded, to use a harsh term..

It will make it's own racing series, with blackjack and hookers..

I agree!

WOW lore is more like LoTR lore.. The game is heavily inspired after the books, which is why so many are attracted to it..

If this was called Warcraft 4, I'd even pay 100 Euros for it..

Good point, Front-Mid-Engined, but nooo, we need Rear-Mid-Engined..

I agree, nice car, but apparently impractical compared to the other hot hatches..

Not a big fan, but I agree that I missed it.. The CTS-V is quite fast..

I thought of a 7 Series, but I didn't see any M7 and I thought that Alpinas don't count..

We don't need a top 10 because there are plenty of awesome and desirable sedans for everyone's taste: