RapidFire88
RapidFire88
RapidFire88

There’s no scenario where one was unaware of what the other had for municipal accounts. Even if they hated each other, fuel companies in proximity all know where the accounts go and what they’re worth. That’s half of refuelers’ administrative responsibility. Literally their business.

75 police cars? That’s no accident. It was obviously done by a cop-hater with a grudge.

Probably burned in a power plant.

The two police departments get their fuel from two separate companies, which happen to be operated by a pair of brothers. One of the brothers, John Mansfield, claims the two companies operate completely separately from one another, and that he was unaware his brother’s company services the West Palm Beach Police

Cooling and charging systems do not an engine make. There is no difference in the airbox or intake.

The West Palm engines are high-performance ones, made for police cars

Who will be responsible? Taxpayers is a pretty good assumption.

I’d say the infrastructure isn’t ready for the tech.

this is really sad. rest in piece sir

Jalopnik bloggers: since you guys are unequivocally Pro-Union , let me explain it in a way you can understand:

The waiver doesn’t mean shit if he can prove negligence. An unexpected sandbag in the runoff doesn’t look good for the track day organization.

The waiver doesn’t excuse gross negligence, put differently the person signing it believes the track owner or event organizer has taken every reasonable precaution to make the track and areas around it as safe as possible.

Your not going to give @streetspeed717 the credit he deserves for putting his car up there? Maybe a link to his YouTube channel? That’s literally how he makes his money and sharing the car is what he does.

The name autopilot is just a red herring. This driver was fully aware of the limitations according to reports listed above. I would agree the name played a factor if this was someone who was using the system the first time and was misled by the name (which none of the cases have been this way; most people don’t trust

complain about the name all you want, but the system has very clear conditions it it meant to work under, while being supervised, anyone purchasing this car is told this by the car, the manual, Tesla, ect... if you want to argue about it not existing then just as well crusie control should not exist because one day

Because you are supposed to be monitoring the system the whole time and steer the vehicle if it’s going the wrong way (which is exactly what this driver did in previous cases)? You don’t wait until it warns to start paying attention. If every Tesla owner with autopilot waited for that, there would be much more

Well then why would he be so chill at that very spot?

If this is true I’m trying to imagine of why anyone would entrust the vehicle in that spot if there was multiple encounters with issues.

We should all be so lucky to die doing what we love. I hope his family and friends can find peace with that. Old Proverb “If you are afraid of death you have already died”

I give you the new family sedan...