Funny how we may all argue and differ on the idea of the “Best” car, but we all tend to agree on the “Worst.”

Fake news! I’ve been getting speeding tickets in manual-transmission cars for years now. YEARS.

“Tap a contact, and you’re location will be shared with them.”

It’s not a physics sim, yes, but many of these jumps seem to defy the physics of the game as I have known them.

Totally agree. The brake check had nothing to do with the crash.

This is why I carry...a crazy person in my back seat. He handles the rage. And I can just relax and enjoy the drive.

Edit: Didn’t realize the malibu was still in front. Thought it was the Grand Am because of the resolution.

Obviously, brake checking someone at that speed is ridiculously unsafe and a major asshole move in any case. But still, I don’t see how it’s the brake-checkers direct fault here. Surely he caused her to be more…

You can clearly see the car swerve and crash into the wall. Just watch the whole video. Doesn’t look like there’s any car in front of the Cobalt thought.

Or just use Waze.

Still the car’s fault though for not entering the lane safely. The law isn’t “do whatever and everyone else has to do their best to avoid you”.

How can a single actor in a multiple actor event be 100% at fault....but also “everyone screwed up”?

Except the driver who posted the video says that if they hadn’t slowed down to allow the motorcycle to split, they would have been the one to hit the car. If there’s a speed differential, the onus to change lanes safely into the faster lane is on the person entering it.

Honestly, I don’t think blindspots came into play here.

Why do shitty drivers sign up for a job that requires nothing but driving?

Dude (somewhat ironically) fueling his Prius was like NOPE NOPE NOPE

So that wasn’t a Mustang leaving Cars and Coffee?

This is why I can’t be a car thief. I’m just way too sentimental with cars. I would turn against my employer in a heartbeat, if I was told to burn a 1960 anything. Oh, you guys are stripping it?... I’ll just take this back to its owner.

Individual deaths aren’t attributable to specific causes, but here is the basic idea of what you do in this type of survey using a different example:

It’s not which is why I hate these type of studies. It’s not provable and therefore not scientific and yet you’ll have people throwing this study in people’s faces. It’s a fun experiment but it should not be taken seriously and yet people will quickly use it to advance their agenda.

Aggregate data is annoying. How is this provable that 1200 more out of like 500 million people died.