It happens way more than you’d think. Check out this subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/dgu/
RapidFire88
RapidFire88
Sorry, I thought the second amendment was titled: “The Right to keep and bear arms”...maybe I was mistaken about it being a right. No? Man, maybe one of us needs to learn how to read lol.
Honestly, Airdroid has to be one of the top 5 utilities out there for Android right now. If you guys don’t have it, give it a try- it’s packed with different tools.
The link appears to be broken; it directs to the sites homepage.
Edit: nevermind, it seems to be working after trying again.
Even more annoying (to me) is all the political BS that’s been coming across my RSS feed thanks to the “gadget site” Gizmodo.
Actually I did find a resource validating my claim- the EPA. Found here: http://insideevs.com/official-epa-figures-reveal-tesla-model-s-85d-new-range-king/ where the city ratings are all lower than highway.
First and foremost, I have yet to see any test validating any of these claims. Second, based on conservation of energy and laws of efficiencies, your claims are not only baseless but ignorant of common sense. It takes more energy to stop and start than to continue on and not all energy can be converted from potential…
Why is this shit on a tech blog Maddie?
Some quick side notes:
Some quick side notes:
As an engineer, I can also add that not all of us are very sociable & outgoing and that’s a very quality for a “Genius”
Not that you asked for it, but this helps prove your statement.
Aside going with the cheapest data package (1GB) or the matching 5GB & 6GB, it’s actually lower across the board plus there are no overages. So say you had 2GB previously, sure you paid $30, but when you likely went over it was $45 where now that’s $5 cheaper.
That would be very interesting to see, I agree. Another user suggested regenerative braking would also work to save the range, but I would still argue that on the basis of conservation of momentum that the range would be significantly lower than what it was rated for under an ‘optimal’ condition.
That’s actually a very good point but based on just conservation of energy with stop and go, regenerative braking isn’t going to get the Tesla near what it was rated for under ‘optimal’ conditions.
The range claimed for any vehicle is not representing if it’s going through the city. Chances are that the range would likely be cut in half to a third in the city.
But if you flashed a stock image to the phone, wouldn’t that be the end of the ads?
Wouldn’t reading her heart rate in-directly determine a calorie count?
The fact that it’s a Fox body with the 5.0 adds major credibility to your statement!
Here’s the thing- when you got rear-ended, your vehicle probably shifted forward giving you say 5-10 feet of deceleration... the ground isn’t the same. This would be more like running into a concrete wall (ie a bridge abutment) backwards at 23 than getting rear-ended and.